Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasFreeper2009
translation: millions will CHOOSE to not have insurance when they are not being FORCED

As soon as catastrophe-only policies with high deductibles are allowed, I'd wager a lot of the uninsured will choose that. That's what insurance was before HMOs came to be.

Pre-existing conditions? How about the OPTION of a government run clinic-style option for only those conditions too expensive to insure, and only when people had the disease? That way, the government would be incentivized to find the least expensive solutions and the pharmaceutical and insurance companies wouldn't have profit or loss from them. Everything except the condition, the person would be responsible for their choices.

The whole idea of insurance covering things which have already happened (like pre-existing conditions) or has to happen (like doctor's visits and vaccines) is insane. The purpose of insurance is to protect one against unexpected and expensive things that might happen.

12 posted on 03/13/2017 2:40:21 PM PDT by grania (only a pawn in their game)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: grania; All

As soon as catastrophe-only policies with high deductibles are allowed, I’d wager a lot of the uninsured will choose that. That’s what insurance was before HMOs came to be.


Does the plan have provisions for major medical plans for those catastrophic medical events?


41 posted on 03/13/2017 3:30:04 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (Inside Every Liberal is a Totalitarian Screaming to Get Out - D. Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson