Skip to comments.
U.S. Deploys Attack Drones To South Korea Amid Tension With North
Reuters ^
| 03/13/17
| James Pearson
Posted on 03/13/2017 6:38:37 AM PDT by Enlightened1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Enlightened1
The worst thing we could do is put troops on the ground in N. Korea, we would have another Vietnam on our hands in my opinion. Carpet bomb the country, target nuclear facilities and if necessary sent the South Korean army in.
2
posted on
03/13/2017 6:48:55 AM PDT
by
TermLimitsforAll
(Term Limits and Walls, that's a start)
To: TermLimitsforAll
Probably an easier solution would be to kill Kim and all his generals in one strike. The citizenry will take care of the local apparachniks after that and then China and South Korea could figure out what to do next.
3
posted on
03/13/2017 6:55:08 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Nuke Bilderberg from orbit. It''s the only way to be sure.)
To: TermLimitsforAll
We are not going to invade North Korea. That would be stupid. The whole country is a somewhat rusty and underfed but armed camp.
But there is a risk of North Korea attacking Southward.
4
posted on
03/13/2017 6:55:59 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(Freedom Before Security!)
To: Enlightened1
“The UAS adds significant intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capability to U.S. Forces Korea and our ROK partners,” United States Forces Korea spokesman Christopher Bush said in a statement.
...
According to that statement they don’t sound like attack drones.
5
posted on
03/13/2017 6:57:08 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Make America Great Again!)
To: Moonman62
They fire HELLFIRE missiles and have been very much engaged in the CENTCOM AOR.
6
posted on
03/13/2017 7:09:59 AM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Cogito ergo sum a conservative pro-American.)
To: Enlightened1
Uh oh. Looks like President Trump is trying to start WW3. /sarc
7
posted on
03/13/2017 7:24:45 AM PDT
by
lodi90
To: EQAndyBuzz
You may have the perfect solution. Look at what happened when we sought a regime change in the middle east though. That didn’t work out so well under Bush 2, then the muslim in charge turned it into a complete fiasco.
8
posted on
03/13/2017 7:25:27 AM PDT
by
TermLimitsforAll
(Term Limits and Walls, that's a start)
To: TermLimitsforAll
We already have troops on the ground in Korea since the treaty.
To: Enlightened1; All
31 years ago (April 14, 1986) President Reagan made the following announcement, right before he bombed the living $hit out of Mu`ammar Qadhafi. "My fellow Americans, at 7 o'clock this evening eastern time air and naval forces of the United States launched a series of strikes against the headquarters, terrorist facilities, and military assets that support Mu`ammar Qadhafi's subversive activities. The attacks were concentrated and carefully targeted to minimize casualties among the Libyan people with whom we have no quarrel. From initial reports, our forces have succeeded in their mission."
10
posted on
03/13/2017 7:36:50 AM PDT
by
areukiddingme1
(areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
To: Enlightened1
That’s correct. In S. Korea. My comment was against troops on the ground in N. Korea only.
11
posted on
03/13/2017 7:41:07 AM PDT
by
TermLimitsforAll
(Term Limits and Walls, that's a start)
To: TermLimitsforAll
I would prefer creating the Island of South Korea, sending all of North Korea straight to Hades
12
posted on
03/13/2017 7:43:29 AM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country.)
To: Enlightened1
We have almost 30,000 troops in South Korea.
Some brave South Korean has to take Kim down.
To: TermLimitsforAll
No one has said boo about putting troops in North Korea which is why your post was questioned.
To: TermLimitsforAll
Agreed. We already have 28,000 in So Korea.
Let Japan, South Korea and the rest of the allies there do the ground work. We can supply them, not fight for them.
15
posted on
03/13/2017 8:28:52 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
To: Enlightened1
16
posted on
03/13/2017 9:41:12 AM PDT
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: elhombrelibre
They fire HELLFIRE missiles and have been very much engaged in the CENTCOM AOR.
...
Great, but the title is misleading considering the statement in the article.
17
posted on
03/13/2017 10:12:38 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Make America Great Again!)
To: Enlightened1
Could lead to a stalemate in the peninsula ? Do the Russians think unification is possible ? That fat boy has to start singing first.
18
posted on
03/13/2017 10:23:03 AM PDT
by
justa-hairyape
(The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
To: Moonman62
They’re journalists. How would they know?
19
posted on
03/13/2017 10:41:00 AM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Cogito ergo sum a conservative pro-American.)
To: justa-hairyape
Some FReepers do not believe it, but Russia seeks to reestablish world order and knock the USA down a few notches. For about ten years now, anytime Putin could push back or get others to harm US interests, he has. Those who only consider US interests from a partisan position may miss the this fact. And, some of them, lash out at anyone speaking ill of their Adonis.
20
posted on
03/13/2017 10:44:07 AM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Cogito ergo sum a conservative pro-American.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson