Posted on 03/10/2017 7:43:44 AM PST by VitacoreVision
Arizona came one step closer to recognizing gold and silver as legal tender within its sovereign borders when a bill to that effect was passed by a committee of the State Senate. By a vote of 4-3, the Republican majority passed HB 2014, which would "exempt from gross income the exchange of one kind of legal tender for another" and redefines legal tender to include "specie," that is to say, "coins having precious metal content.”
In plain English, this proposal would provide a way for Arizonans to buy and sell gold and silver without having to treat it as a capital gain, thus reducing the reach of the Federal Reserve inside the state of Arizona.
Testifying before the committee was former presidential candidate and congressman from Texas, Dr. Ron Paul. “We ought not to tax money, and that’s a good idea. It makes no sense to tax money,” Paul told the state senators. “Paper is not money, it’s a substitute for money and it’s fraud,” he added, referring to the fractional-reserve banking practiced by the Federal Reserve and other central banks. Referring to the bill’s elimination of capital gains taxes on gold and silver, the sponsor of the bill, State Representative Mark Finchem, said, “What the IRS has figured out at the federal level is to target inflation as a gain. They call it capital gains.”
As it stands today, the laws of the state of Arizona require that all debts be paid in Federal Reserve notes or in coins issued by the government of the United States. This is in direct contradiction to the Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution, which reads, “No State shall … make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts.”
A Tenth Amendment Center article published in the Ron Paul Liberty Report cited constitutional tender expert Dr. William Greene on the subject of the effect of legalizing the exchange of gold and silver as legal tender:
Over time, as residents of the state use both Federal Reserve notes and silver and gold coins, the fact that the coins hold their value more than Federal Reserve notes do will lead to a ‘reverse Gresham’s Law’ effect, where good money (gold and silver coins) will drive out bad money (Federal Reserve notes). As this happens, a cascade of events can begin to occur, including the flow of real wealth toward the state’s treasury, an influx of banking business from outside of the state — as people in other states carry out their desire to bank with sound money — and an eventual outcry against the use of Federal Reserve notes for any transactions.
In a paper published in 2010, Greene explained the history of legislative attempts to break up the Fed’s monopoly on money and the failure of those efforts:
Since its inception, the U.S. Federal Reserve’s monetary policies have led to a decline of over 95% in the purchasing power of the U.S. dollar. As a result, there have been several attempts to curtail or eliminate the Federal Reserve’s powers (e.g., the efforts of Rep. Louis T. McFadden in the 1930s; the efforts of Rep. Wright Patman in the 1970s; the efforts of Rep. Henry Gonzalez in the 1990s; and the efforts of Rep. Ron Paul since the 1990s). However, none have proven successful to date, due mainly to the constraints of strong political opposition at the national level.
Paul’s persuasiveness paid off this time, though, and after the successful passage of the sound money bill by the Arizona State Senate Finance Committee, Dr. Paul attended a rally on the grounds of the Arizona State Capitol where he told the throng of listeners that “They were on the right side of history” and that even though those working to restore constitutional liberty to Arizona and all the states “had a great burden to bear,” he assured them that there are “more than you know” working toward the same goal.
The next step for HB 2014 is consideration by the State Senate Rules Committee.
I don’t quite see how this will reverse Gresham’s Law.
People will tend to hoard “good money”, with it all trickling to those better at keeping it than others - who will end up with mostly “bad money”.
I’m not knocking the attempt, just not convinced it will work out well. I’d rather have the tax-free option than not.
From a reprint of the Dallas Morning News, Jan 1,1900.
(from an article on Jefferson Davis’ release)Page 12.
Salmon P. Chase, Secretary of the Treasury, issued the first greenbacks during the Civil War. When he became Chief Justice of the SCOTUS, he decided the greenbacks WERE NOT LEGAL TENDER and that “Only gold and silver was legal tender or could ever be legal tender.”
So how come I have a pocket full of worthless greenbacks?
Utah passed this law in 2011.
First Substitute H.B. 317
8 General Description:
9 This bill recognizes gold and silver coins that are issued by the federal government as
10 legal tender in the state and exempts the exchange of the coins from certain types of
11 state tax liability.
12 Highlighted Provisions:
13 This bill:
14 . provides definitions;
15 . recognizes gold and silver coins issued by the federal government to be legal tender
16 in the state;
17 . does not compel a person to tender or accept gold and silver coin;
18 . provides that the exchange of gold and silver coins for another form of legal tender
19 does not create any individual income or sales tax liability;
Modern paper money is considered greenbacks. The Kingston Trio did a song about them.
And I don’t give a damn about a greenback dollar
Spend it fast as I can
For a wailin’ song and a good guitar
The only things that I understand, poor boy
The only things that I understand
Greenbacks were eventually backed by Gold.
Specie Resumption Act
http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h719.html
The Specie Resumption Act was a triumph for the “hard money” forces over the “soft money” advocates during the second Grant administration.
The United States government had issued $450 million in greenbacks during the Civil War. These paper notes were not backed by specie (gold or silver) and maintained value only through trust in the government.
After the war the debtor elements, desiring inflation, wanted the greenbacks to remain in circulation and for new notes to be issued. Conservative forces, abhorring inflation, opposed these schemes and wanted all paper currency to be backed by gold.
Under the Funding Act of 1866, greenbacks in circulation were gradually reduced to $356 million on February 4, 1868, when further retirement was ended. The amount was temporarily raised to $382 million by 1872, but Grant vetoed the Inflation Bill, intended to increase the circulation of greenbacks permanently to $400 million.
On January 14, 1875, a Republican lame-duck Congress passed Senator George Edmunds’ Specie Resumption Act, which provided:
- That the U.S. Treasury be prepared to resume the redemption of legal tender notes in specie (gold) as of January 1, 1879
- That gradual steps be taken to reduce the number of greenbacks in circulation
- That all “paper coins” (notes with denominations less than one dollar) be removed from circulation and be replaced with silver coins.
Despite opposition from the Greenback Party, specie payments were resumed on the appointed date. The dire predictions of citizens storming the banks to demand gold for the greenbacks never occurred. As 1879 approached, the government prudently increased its specie reserves and the public became convinced that their paper notes were “as good as gold.”
Greenbacks were killed with the Federal Reserve.
U.S. currency is now called Federal Reserve Notes (1913)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.