How will we be able to know the difference?
This is going to require some time and effort to examine but considering the recent exposure of three brothers (Abid, Imran, and Jamal Awan) who together with wives managed office IT for members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and other lawmakers while managing to filter data out to their own private server, consider the following video/hyperlinked transcript which reveals similar details - but on a global scale - exposed from financial investigations into 9/11.
Here's a direct link preset to that point of the video:
and here is the
with which to follow it up.
Here is one very brief quote to whet the appetite:
===>"Given the nature of the information and secrets being kept by its clients, it should come as no surprise that many of PTech’s top investors and employees were men with backgrounds that should have been raising red flags at all levels of the government."<===
(take blood pressure meds before watching)
A rough outline illustrates this lack of vetting is establishing a pattern of horrific incompetence if not aiding and abetting the enemy within and without:
Given the nature of this sensitive risk-management work, only a company with experience delivering software to large-scale organizations with secrets to protect would fit the bill, and in this regard PTech did not disappoint.Their client roster included a veritable who’s who of top-level corporate and governmental clients:
the FBI, the IRS, NATO, the Air Force, the Naval Air Command, the Departments of Energy and Education, the Postal Service, the US House of Representatives, the Department of Defense, the Secret Service, even the White House. From the inner sanctum of the White House to the headquarters of the FBI, from the basement of the FAA to the boardroom of IBM, some of the best-secured organizations in the world running on some of the most protected servers housing the most sensitive data welcomed PTech into their midst.
Sanctioned by the UN Security Council for his suspected links to Al Qaeda, Yasin al-Qadi-backed investment firm Sarmany Ltd. became an “angel investor” to a software startup called PTech, providing $5 million of the initial $20 million of capital that got PTech off the ground.
.................Note: Yassin Abdullah al-Qadi is a character included in the banned/pulped book "Alms for Jihad" which was re-released online here: Scribd: Alms for Jihad: Charity and Terrorism in the Islamic World
............................................................
al-Qadi continued investing millions of dollars in the company through various fronts and investment vehicles. Company insiders told FBI officials that they were flown to Saudi Arabia to meet PTech’s investors in 1999 and that al-Qadi was introduced as one of the owners. It has also been reported that Hussein Ibrahim, PTech’s chief scientist, was al-Qadi’s representative at PTech and al-Qadi’s lawyers have admitted that al-Qadi’s representative may have continued to sit on PTech’s board even after 9/11.
Hussein Ibrahim himself was a former president of BMI, a New Jersey-based real estate investment firm that was also one of the initial investors in PTech and provided financing for PTech’s founding loan. PTech leased office space and computer equipment from BMI and BMI shared office space in New Jersey with Kadi International, owned and operated by none other than Yassin al-Qadi. In 2003, counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke said:
“BMI held itself out publicly as a financial services provider for Muslims in the United States, its investor list suggests the possibility this facade was just a cover to conceal terrorist support.”Suheil Laheir was PTech’s chief architect. When he wasn’t writing the software that would provide PTech with detailed operational blueprints of the most sensitive agencies in the U.S. government, he was writing articles in praise of Islamic holy war.
He was also fond of quoting Abdullah Azzam, Osama Bin Laden’s mentor and the head of Maktab al-Khidamat, which was the precursor to Al-Qaeda.
That such an unlikely cast of characters were given access to some of the most sensitive agencies in the U.S. federal government is startling enough. That they were operating software that allowed them to map, analyze and access every process and operation within these agencies for the purpose of finding systemic weak points is equally startling. Most disturbing of all, though, is the connection between PTech and the very agencies that so remarkably “failed” in their duty to protect the American public on September 11, 2001.
----------Note: Ptech Inc. was a Quincy, Massachusetts-based provider of business process modeling software that was renamed to GoAgile in late 2003 as a consequence to the media frenzy wiki link
************ Currently, a search of the identity GoAgile ...
Key Execs listed:
“The worst-case scenario is that this is a situation where this was planned for a very long time to establish a company in this country and in the computer software business that would target federal agencies and gain access to key government data to essentially help terrorists launch another attack.” [National Public Radio, 12/8/2002]
**************
All of this information is a rehash of info available on the web but displays a disheartening confirmation of minimal activity resulting in court and incarceration. Since 2008, there is little to NO updates on related and similar nefarious infiltration of Muslim Brotherhood entities which, no doubt, has expanded to a degree which boggles the mind.