Summary of article: so Douglas J. Hagmann a PI for 30 years is making an educated guess that President Trump has evidence. Hannity has a former CIA agent who states the same thing…. So I a person who has so many years of experience in something can state the President has evidence.
I am guessing President Trump has something back up his statements, he is smart business person.
No offense to anybody: However I am not impress by people like Hagmann and the ex-cia agent who come on the different news outlets and claim to be in the know…
Folks, the republic is in serious trouble. We don't have to worry about an invasion, we have been taken over from within.
“Summary of article: so Douglas J. Hagmann a PI for 30 years is making an educated guess that President Trump has evidence. . . . .
No offense to anybody: However I am not impress by people like Hagmann and the ex-cia agent who come on the different news outlets and claim to be in the know…”
Agree 100%; you show the baseline level of skepticism.
I stopped reading and started skimming the article for evidence when I saw: “according to Douglas J. Hagmann, President Trump now has evidence of a paper trail...”
If the next sentence doesn’t lay out the evidence, something’s wrong.
A lot of time is wasted on everyone’s part writing, publishing and reading articles with no verifiable evidence.
We here on FR have heard of “disinformation,” and the Dem tactic of creating a fog of reports around an investigation leading to uncertainty of what to believe and disillusionment when theories and predictions fizzle.
Fortunately, the antidote is simple: look for facts. Not distracting facts, either.
They are basing this on various news reports and rumors that are circulating. It’s very important to know that this whole computers talking thing was a farce, based on an anonymous “scientist” claiming to detect Internet meta data. It was pure BS.
_____________________________________________________________
There is some advantage in having experience, but, like you I like facts.
I personally believe that it is likely that Trump is the smartest person to occupy the office of President of The United States since Thomas Jefferson, that says a lot.
It is truly hard for me to believe that a guy as smart as Trump, who has always been right, would say something publicly he can't back up with proof. He likely suspected being tapped all along but once in the office has access to proof.
Everyone on the left expected Clinton to win and their illegal activities to be hidden forever and even if found not prosecuted. It could get interesting. While I do not expect to see Clinton or Obama behind bars it is possible that some actors in the crimes will be behind bars and that Clinton and Obama will be politically deeply harmed. They will be in the same category as Nixon, not crooks that everybody knows are crooks. My hope is that their convictions of crimes will hurt them horribly financially and that congress will impeach both of them. It is my understanding that even once out of office you can be impeached, where if convicted never allowed to hold office again. As a further punishment I would love to see any Federal pensions removed from them. Let them have Social Security just like everybody else.