Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DHS head: Trump Has ‘convincing’ Wiretap Proof
The Hill ^ | - 03/06/17 06:21 PM EST | BY MARK HENSCH

Posted on 03/06/2017 8:01:37 PM PST by drewh

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last
To: drewh
President Trump possesses credible evidence that former President Barack Obama ordered the wiretapping of Trump Tower

Kelly says that Obama ordered the wiretap and there is evidence.

21 posted on 03/06/2017 8:15:47 PM PST by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris
I think this is a case of the msm generating false headlines again. That is not exactly what he said. What he did actually say was:

"If the president of the United States said that, he’s got his reasons to say it"
22 posted on 03/06/2017 8:16:46 PM PST by JoSixChip (Cruz <- sleaze; Clinton <- criminal; Trump <- winner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

just caught a minute of O’Reilly with Gingrich. O’Reilly saying Trump must put up evidence. Gingrich says you already proved it - Flynn was in Trump Towers. O’Reilly had to agree.

has anyone found or posted any of the articles which state the Flynn phone calls were made from Trump Tower and there were allegedly transcripts etc? for me, that was proof at the time that the phones at the Tower were bugged.

I looked for some articles yesterday but never found those that mentioned this fact.


23 posted on 03/06/2017 8:18:45 PM PST by MAGAthon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: drewh
“A cardinal rule of the Obama Administration was that no White House official ever interfered with any independent investigation led by the Department of Justice,” he said in a statement. "As part of that practice, neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen.”

I just don't get that at all. Are they saying the DoJ wiretapped an opposition candidate based on innuendo about Russia ginned up by the DNC, and the WH knew about it and did nothing?

Banana republic is too good a word for it. Obama turned us into Zimbabwe.

24 posted on 03/06/2017 8:19:16 PM PST by palmer (turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

Ah.

Thanks for the info.


25 posted on 03/06/2017 8:19:19 PM PST by SaveFerris (Hebrews 13:2 Do not forget to entertain strangers, for ... some have unwittingly entertained angels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: drewh

So can we consider that an admission that they interfered with the non-independent investigations?


26 posted on 03/06/2017 8:19:50 PM PST by ArmstedFragg (So Long Obie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

I take it you are a cop and I respect your service. I’m just noting who’s still on TV making statements and who’s still silent/missing in their ‘resistance’ movement.


27 posted on 03/06/2017 8:20:50 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing
(Is this a dream about a weird spy movie or is this real life?)

Loretta Lynch is the most logical person for them to blame. She's already complicit because of meeting Bill on the tarmac. It would be great if McCain got a whole lot of blame for his involvement with the Steele dossier.

Does anyone know if hillary was given access to the wiretap info? That would be amazing, but not surprising.

28 posted on 03/06/2017 8:21:05 PM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

All Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton talked about was their grandkids. CNN told me so...


29 posted on 03/06/2017 8:21:35 PM PST by Blue Highway (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: drewh
Trump Has ‘convincing’ Wiretap Proof

“If the president of the United States said that, he’s got his reasons to say it,” Kelly said

The headline says Trump has the evidence, but Kelly seems to merely be saying that Trump has evidence by inference, only because Trump would not have said what he did without evidence. The latter a much weaker situation.

30 posted on 03/06/2017 8:21:43 PM PST by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
Trump wouldn't do that would he?


31 posted on 03/06/2017 8:22:33 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: drewh

The problem with Obolo’s implausible deniability is found exactly in what our friend Mark stated the other day which also makes it delicious irony:his plowboys from the MSM published the applications in June and Oct. and along with the leaks they were publishing he bloody well knew what they were doing.But there will likely be a smoking gun somewhere.


32 posted on 03/06/2017 8:23:47 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

You don’t know what role Comey is playing in this.


33 posted on 03/06/2017 8:24:37 PM PST by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C210N

He also says... “[Trump’s] got some convincing evidence that that took place.”


34 posted on 03/06/2017 8:25:05 PM PST by nhwingut (Trump Pence 16 - Blow Up DC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MAGAthon

The excuse at the time was that the Ambassador’s phone was being tapped.


35 posted on 03/06/2017 8:25:38 PM PST by ArmstedFragg (So Long Obie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: drewh
My question is why Obama and Lynch would use Comey to run this survelance of Trump when they were having fits about his announcing the renewal of FBI looking into Clinton's emails. Comey was in the administration doghouse at they time.

Why would they not bypass him for another agency or they guy at the FBI who the dems gave money to his wife?

36 posted on 03/06/2017 8:27:42 PM PST by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

I think we’ll find out. Trump could be negotiating their fates for all we know. I think the evidence Trump holds is colossal and could run deep.


37 posted on 03/06/2017 8:28:20 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: grania; Blue Highway

How I think it went down, Clinton forcing the meeting with Lynch at Sky Harbor tarmac:

WJC: Loretta, on the 16th, a dear golfing buddy’s grandson applied for a job in your agency and was turned down. Can you look to see if his resume was processed properly? He applied for an internal telecom job. Name of Warren B. Goode.
Lynch: Oh, yes, I remember him, and there was a glitch, but I’m 99% sure he’s been hired but will be contacted with the offer on Monday. You know, my grandkids are always trying to get me to play golf with them. I need to take them up on it.

JUNE
Holder/McCabe: We need a tap on Trump because Russians.
FISA: GFY

OCTOBER:
Somebody/McCabe: We need a tap on HRC because she might be colluding with DOJ on the election and plus we’ve already had the tap data on Trump accidentally disseminated everywhere and could you make that DJT warrant retroactive to June.
FISA: Why, of course!


38 posted on 03/06/2017 8:28:45 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Sr American Officials = chow line at old folks home


39 posted on 03/06/2017 8:31:14 PM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

That Comey hasn’t let McCabe loose is all I need to know. Comey has a long history of covering for the Clintoons. That Comey would work for Low Retta, the Lyncher is very problematic, though his dough from HSBC should have set him up for life.


40 posted on 03/06/2017 8:32:17 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson