RATs are dead....
I hope you are right....but...how do we get around an intepretation which says simply, “the FISA court obviously believed the Trump campaign was seriously engaged with the Russians”?
Could this not also be, theoretically, “proof” that the collaboration with the Russians is something that people were worried about?
I get it that that’s the Dem talking point. But in order to truly bury the Dems, we gotta get around. Because on the face of it, it seems plausible.
(I’m still trying to get up to speed here...so please forgive me if that comment is stupid :)).
I am wondering, really. So there is a suspected link uncovered between Trump and a Russian based server, which WOULD it seems warrant a FISA authorization and this = the rats are dead? How is that bad for the democrats? I guess I don’t understand the thinking.
====================================================
REALITY CHECK---It is entirely possible Obama and his legal team may have perjured themselves before the FISA court by willfully withholding material information in order to manipulate the FISA court’s willingness to permit the government surveillance.
This would fall under the Crimes Act of 1958.
FALSIFYING GOVT DOCUMENTS---falsifying official documents is the criminal MO to hide larger crimes.
A person falsifying documents can be held criminally liable if they are deliberately acting with the intention of deceiving or defrauding another party.
Falsifying documents is a very serious offense and is generally classified as a felony. This means that a person charged with falsifying documents may be subject to the following legal penalties:
◾Having to pay a monetary fine
◾Incarceration in a prison facility
Depending on the gravity of the offense, as well as individual state laws, falsifying documents can result in a prison sentence of 5-10 years.
Also, if official government documents or govt authorities were involved, the legal penalties may be more severe. Legal penalties may increase with repeat offenses.
Many different types of acts can be considered as falsifying a document, including:
◾Altering or misrepresenting fact-based information
◾Stating false information when requested to provide truthful statements
◾Forging a signature
◾Using official letterheads without authorization
◾Knowingly using or distributing a fake document
The penalty for falsifying government documents is outlined in the Crimes Act of 1958.
rats are dead IF the rinos allow it....
What went unreported today was Trump third Saturday tweet about how the DNC would not let the FBI look at there hacked server that told us how the screwed Bernie.
DNC said the Russians hacked us, that is what our IT firm said (the 3 brothers?) but no FBI you can’t see it so you have to believe our Russian story. Then bleach bit the server so no one knows and we run wi the Russian story as Manafort had dealings over there and Trump did not release his tax returns.
So grab a torch and storm the Frankenstein Castle. Mob mentality takes over. Say Russians enough times over and over and everyone believes it as fact
Only if the GOP shows some aggressiveness in this matter instead of their usual docility.