Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Excellent article.
1 posted on 03/03/2017 8:12:03 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: TigerClaws

And massive Democrat voter fraud...


2 posted on 03/03/2017 8:13:50 PM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Most Americans instinctively understand the freedoms and liberties as guaranteed by the Constitution. That’s why Obama has lost over 1,000 seats. Nobody wants to live under Marxism.


3 posted on 03/03/2017 8:25:54 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (STOP THE TAPE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

ICE is deporting a large portion of the “democrat” voter base. There goes Clintoonie’s “popular vote” win. Might need to ask her to return the participation trophy.


4 posted on 03/03/2017 8:26:08 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (I tried being reasonable, I didn't like it. - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

1968 = 2016 Demonstrations in the streets, by violent liberals.

From 1968 through 1992 the GOP won 5 of 6 Presidential elections.

Nixon twice, Reagan twice plus Bush I. A lot of law & order, was part of the GOP appeal.


5 posted on 03/03/2017 8:27:36 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Yup ... I was just reading it myself and one point he makes is about Obama losing support every year.... in every battleground state, all 11 of them, from the 2008 election to the 2012 election, he lost half or more of his support.

The big surprise of Trump busting the “Blue Wall” was no surprise at all...you could see it coming if you looked. Which makes it all the more incredible that Clinton never went to Wisconsin once...what trends in Iowa and Ohio(and Trump led every poll in both states for 8 months) is going to trend in WI, PA and MI. How a professional campaign did not see that is unreal...high paid million dollar consultants for what?..

Remember Bill Clinton calling Obamacare a mess? I hate the guy, but he saw it coming, which is why there was a bar brawl in Clinton headquarters election night:)


6 posted on 03/03/2017 8:33:31 PM PST by MaxistheBest (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws
The Democratic Party is facing a demographic crisis

Duh. That's why they're importing semi-functional dependent voters from every corner of the third world.

7 posted on 03/03/2017 8:35:19 PM PST by Steely Tom (Liberals think in propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Martin Armstrong published an interesting chart of the number of congressional seats held by each party. Many here write about politics being a pendulum swinging back and forth. This is evident in the chart, but what is also evident is that the democrats peaked in FDR’s administration, and each succeeding peak is lower than the previous one. They are in a long bear market, and have not hit their low yet.


9 posted on 03/03/2017 8:38:17 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Unfortunately for the ‘rats, there are only a limited number of perpetual ninth-graders who will vote for a candidate because he’s cool or it’s the in-thing to do......


10 posted on 03/03/2017 8:38:59 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

yep, Demographics are trouble for Dems.

White Dems: Forget it, it’s over. They effectively disenfranchised themselves by playing the races against each other and importing so many Muslims and Mexicans.

The truth is Mexicans, Blacks, Muslims are among the biggest racist out there and they only vote for their own and there is no way they will continue to let whites rule them. So once the aging White baby boomer Liberal already in power dies or retires, they are going to want one of their own in there.

If you’re a white (especially a White Male) no matter how good of a Liberal you are, because of your color you will be shut out and disenfranchised. Cuomo, O’Malley, Webb and even Warren & Biden are dreaming if they think the Hispanics and Blacks will ever support them in a primary over one of their own. Look at that White Liberal male who dared to challenge Pelosi, he was shouted down as misogynist. In the future any White Liberal that challenges a minority will get the same treatment and be shouted down as a racist.

If a White Dem somehow gets the nomination, you will see what happened with Hillary in that the Blacks and Hispanics will lose interest and stay home and they lose the election.

And like wise if another Black Dem gets the nomination, Hispanics will lose interest and stay home. If an Hispanic gets the nomination, Blacks won’t care and they will have lower turnout. The current crop of Black and Hispanic dems don’t have Obama’s appeal so none of them will bring out Whites “looking to make History/prove they ain’t racist.

So if (and a big “if”) the Republicans don’t &*#@ things up, they should rule for a long time


11 posted on 03/03/2017 8:45:40 PM PST by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

When you promote abortion and same-gender coupling you cut off your future generations.


12 posted on 03/03/2017 8:47:24 PM PST by lightman (Trump = A glourius amalgamation of Andrew Jackson, Teddy Roosevelt, and Ronald Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

“first major party female candidate for president, running against a notorious misogynist, captured the Democrats’ lowest share of female voters since 2004”


A notorious mysogynist? Really?

.


13 posted on 03/03/2017 8:54:02 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Here is a key number from our book, “How Trump Won” :

Trump lost VA, ME, MN, NH, NM, NV, and CO by a TOTAL of 510,000 votes. That’s over 50 more electoral votes. The “flip factor” is a mere 270,000 votes.

While Dems obsess over the popular vote margin, this is pretty shocking. Moreover, Trump got a quarter million more votes in PA than Romney did. There will be no stupid sex tape in 2020. Dems are increasingly a coastal party + Chicago.


14 posted on 03/03/2017 9:00:20 PM PST by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws
For instance, there is a common misconception that Trump was ushered into power by old, white, economically disenfranchised men. However, according to the exit polls, Trump actually did worse than Romney among whites and seniors, but outperformed him among blacks, Asians, Hispanics and young people. While the Democrats lost a lot of support among low-income Americans, I think it would be a mistake to interpret these as Trump’s base. He won a plurality of every income bracket above US$50,000 as well. He also won more non-Christian and nonreligious voters than any Republican since the 2000 election.

The sobbing sound off in the distance is Michael Moore - crying like a little baby.

16 posted on 03/03/2017 9:04:13 PM PST by GOPJ ("Acting' is the art of lying convincingly. Outside of Hollywood that's 'con-men' stuff..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Trump is bringing young people into the party while all Bush did was drive them away. I had to google up what “based” means to young people to understand what they say about Trump. I obviously never had to google up anything with Bush.


19 posted on 03/03/2017 9:18:56 PM PST by BestPresidentEver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Democrats depend on ballot box stuffing. Hopefully, Trump will take care of that problem.


20 posted on 03/03/2017 9:34:01 PM PST by wintertime (stop treating government teachers like they are reincarnated Mother Teresas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

“The data showed that the voting patterns of key demographic groups shifted dramatically downward from 2008 through 2016.”

2008 had the highest voter turnout since 1968, around 60% or so. 2012 and 2016 were in the mid 50% ranges or so. We haven’t had even 65% eligible voter turnout since 1908.

I thought that if Trump was going to win, it was going to be by a landslide, and with massive turnout. I was wrong. He won because the dem turnout sucked this time around in key states. I guess time will tell if that trend continues. If I was the dems I would only run non-white male candidates for president.

FReegards


22 posted on 03/03/2017 9:40:22 PM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws; ExTexasRedhead

The only “fly in the ointment” right now in the goal of a Conservative Republican majority for as long as the eye can see is the Vichy Republicans. We cannot hope to hold on and gain with the likes of what we have as “Republicans” in elective office today. Unless somehow Trump prevails, Republicans may well snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, thus giving the Marxist RATs a way back to power. And the real problem I see is that the voters are not well schooled enough to realize they are continuing to return a bunch of worthless turds to office. People who manage to stay in office by coming home when their election comes around to blow smoke up the voters a$$es convincing them that they are “conservatives.”


23 posted on 03/03/2017 9:48:42 PM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

See the article for many links:

http://theconversation.com/the-democratic-party-is-facing-a-demographic-crisis-72948


24 posted on 03/03/2017 9:58:55 PM PST by iowamark (I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

‘Rats never stop unless incarcerated or eliminated.

DEPOPULATE ‘rats from the body politic. DRAIN THE SWAMP!

HOORAY Americans!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvDVgTcQ2Z0


25 posted on 03/03/2017 10:17:13 PM PST by PGalt (HOORAY President Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

“Excellent article.”

Agree, I covered most of it in my FR Homepage starting about 2 years ago, after the 2014 midterm sweep in the South, nice to see the ‘experts’ starting to catch up a bit. Even back then, it became OBVIOUS that it was very easy to put the Dems out of business, if we wanted to...but that was a big IF.

The Dems had moved so far left that even blacks (to some extent), but especially (legal) Hispanics really had to hold their noses to vote for them. Even blacks aren’t so hot about gay marriage, or opening up bathrooms to pervs. Hispanics, at least in the South, want to own guns as much as whites, so it was always going to be sporty for the Dems to reel them in (and in 2014, they did not do well, at all with Hispanics). The Dems have absolutely no middle left in their party.

The problem the Republicans had before Trump, and still have, even with Trump is that their leadership figured there was no need to fight for white votes, for the following reasons (off the top of my head):
1) Who else are they going to vote for.
2) Much of what the Dems were doing as party (TPP, open borders) matched what the donors wanted.
3) Whites were declining in numbers, the Republicans better become ‘more inclusive’.
4) The social norms of the country were moving left at breakneck speed.
5) We should not play the ‘identity politics’ game like they do.

Now for why EVERYTHING above is wrong:
1) White (some) will vote Democrat, instead of Republican, in some cases - for example, if they perceive the Republicans as taking away their Social Security, while neither party otherwise distinguishes itself from the other, and neither appears to love the country (to many Republicans, loving the country is ‘white nationalism’, so they try to stay clear of it). Obviously, also, whites can and will stay home if not provided with a decent candidate.

2) This one’s self-evident - the big-time donor class has their agenda and will send their money where they think it will work most effectively - they barely care about political parties or other issues. Also, lots of Republicans, particularly donors, also want to break loose of the hard-right (people like us)...they see us socially backwards, and if they identify with us, they are outcasts in their own social circles. Such as “Yuck, how do you tolerate someone like Ted Cruz in your party” as no-doubt said many times at DC ‘socials’.

3) (whites are disappearing) True, to some extent, but not nearly bad enough to have to cause a panic...and for lots of reasons. The article directly points out one important reason, which is that states with large and growing minority populations tend to already be single party (New York, Texas, California, Illinois). Florida, and to a lesser extent, Colorado, are the only swing states where growing non-whites can affect the statewide voting. The article also indirectly alludes to another factor - that 70% of people voting are whites...this number is at least 10% greater than the percentage of whites in the country overall and will likely remain much higher, as minorities tend to be younger (more kids) and minorities simply don’t vote as much. Two other potential factors work to our advantage: (1) If we can end voter fraud, (2) If we can take care of Illegals, and slow down legal immigration. The bottom line for this is that it may be 40 years or so before demographics wipes out the Republicans...especially as Dems move further and further left.

4) The continuing movement of social norms is real, but not inevitable. It is fueled first by the left’s control over education, second by the left’s control of the media and Hollywood, and lastly by the fact that Republicans would just rather ‘avoid the social issues’. But how far left can the public tolerate? We were asked (over and over) how two men deciding to get married would affect us straight people. And while the real answer (lack of kids) would play out over decades at a macro level, it was difficult to answer on a micro level. Well, when bathrooms are opened up to pervs, then they are in our faces, and they won’t even get near asking that same question again. So they’re out of room socially, but they will keep moving left, with ‘normalization’ of pedophilia coming very soon.

5) The Democrats used to not play the ‘identity politics’ game, for most of their existence. Until 20 years or so ago, blacks voted in small numbers, and Hispanics were not a force at all...yet Democrats won and kept huge majorities in Congress and won the White House around half the time. So they accomplished all that with white voters, the same voters that the Republicans needed. Fast-forward now, and the Dems, obviously, have written off ever getting a majority of the white vote again...it’s all identity politics to them, with blacks and Hispanics, and (sadly) Asians now. So the rules changed under our feet...the only question was whether we play by Democrat rules, or try to stick to some outdated idealist set of rules, where we also treat whites like garbage. Hopefully the Republicans will learn something from Trump on this...hopefully.

Lots more, of course, and more specifics on my FR homepage.


31 posted on 03/04/2017 5:28:51 AM PST by BobL (In Honor of the NeverTrumpers, I declare myself as FR's first 'Imitation NeverTrumper')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson