Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoFloFreeper

Such a sad situation. We were truly looking forward to seeing a family film. The 1990s version was a visual and story telling delight.

Sadly, now it appears we will avoid this apparent celebration of sin. By the way, if a homosexual were ALREADY part of the story, then there wouldn’t be a problem.

My problem is the blatant injection of the sexual content.


6 posted on 03/03/2017 3:05:02 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: SoFloFreeper

I agree. It is one thing to have a homosexual character. It is something entirely different to promote that character and scene as some great SJW statement that belittles all us throwbacks who still think homosexuality is a deviant, aka unnatural, behavior.


9 posted on 03/03/2017 3:14:59 AM PST by CitizenUSA (Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson