Posted on 03/02/2017 8:51:22 AM PST by Prov1322
Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 2015 Posted at 11:34 am on March 2, 2017 by Sam J.
You have to laugh at the Democrats and their feigned and calculated outrage over a senator from the Armed Services Committee meeting with the ambassador of Russia; of course that senator is AG Sessions but seriously, this is their big freakout.
Forget that Sessions did not meet with the ambassador regarding Trump’s campaign (that was what he was asked folks), but since he merely MET with him, Democrats want him to resign.
Immediately.
So does that mean these 30 Democrats should resign as well?
Up to 30 Senate Democrats (!) met with Russian diplomats in 2015 to help grease the skids for Obama's Iran deal. https://t.co/GhZnMhTtAd pic.twitter.com/3LPABS9sje
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) March 2, 2017 Oopsie.
trending AWKWARD! Ben Shapiro nails Leftists whining about Trump's 'widow prop' with 2 pics Hillary will hate
Democrats are such silly people.
@seanmdav Mass resignations are called for, obviously.
— JWF (@JammieWF) March 2, 2017 @seanmdav @MaeroCarol @TheDemocrats Resign Immediately ~ America
— Kim (@Kim_d_marlin) March 2, 2017 And as expected, Democrats when confronted with this claimed they weren’t under oath but neither was Sessions; they asked him about the Trump campaign, not his capacity as a senator.
. @seanmdav @corrcomm Investigate them all! They should all resign immediately!!!!! Get on it @SenSchumer !
— 🚨Code Red 🇺🇸 (@dubstandardUSA) March 2, 2017 Dear Democrats,
Thank you for doing so many stupid things so often.
You complete us.
Love,
Twitchy
Related:
D’OH! Claire McCaskill’s attempt to prove rarity of meetings with Russian ambassador backfires hilariously https://t.co/mO5b5Yi6JC
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) March 2, 2017 tags:
I went home with a waitress the way I always do
How was I to know she was with the Russians, too?
I was gambling in Havana - I took a little risk
Send lawyers, guns, and money
Dad, get me out of this
Wow.
Shows how insane that bunch is. Podesta must not have been a part of the folks calling for the Russia connection strategy to take down Trump. Because he sure has some Russian connections. Putin must really dislike Hillary.
Ouch, that’s gonna leave a mark.
Excellent point.
“NO SLEEPING IN BEDS!” err {edit} “WIF SHEETS!”
Bookmark
Democrats Admit to Being Lobbied by Russia, China and Europe Before Backing Iran Nuclear Deal
By Patrick Goodenough
September 3, 2015
(CNSNews.com) – More than a dozen of the 34 Democratic senators who have declared their support for the Iran nuclear agreement cited arguments by America’s five negotiating partners that there would be no better deal forthcoming if the U.S. rejects this one.
On Wednesday, the number of senators to have publicly stated support for the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) climbed to 34 – all Democrats – thereby giving President Obama the backing he needs to sustain his veto of a Republican-led resolution disapproving it, which is expected to pass by mid-September.
As previously undecided senators one by one came out in support of the agreement over the past month, references in their statements to the views of the other P5+1 governments involved in the negotiations – Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany – were strikingly common.
Many of them attended a briefing by ambassadors from those countries in early August.
When she announced her support for the deal on August 6, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) said, “In a meeting earlier this week, when I questioned the ambassadors of our P5+1 allies, it also became clear that if we reject this deal, going back to the negotiation table is not an option.”
Four days later Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) said she had asked the ambassadors of the five other countries involved in the talks “detailed questions about what their countries and others would do if Congress does not approve the agreement.”
“[N]ot one of them believed that abandoning this deal would result in a better deal,” she said. Instead, “international consensus” would splinter, sanctions would unravel and Iran’s nuclear program would be left unconstrained.
On Aug. 13, Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) also referred to the ambassadors’ briefing.
“[S]ome say that, should the Senate reject this agreement, we would be in position to negotiate a ‘better’ one,” he wrote. “But I’ve spoken to representatives of the five nations that helped broker the deal, and they agree that this simply wouldn’t be the case.
“[A]t a recent meeting of leaders from our partner nations, I specifically asked the ambassadors to the U.S. from China, the United Kingdom, and Russia whether their countries would come back to negotiate again should the U.S. walk away from the deal,” Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) said on Aug. 17.
“They unanimously said, ‘No,’ that there was already a deal – the one before Congress.”
“I have no reason to disbelieve all five governments [Russia, China, Britain, France, Germany] speaking together,” said Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) on Aug. 18. “I have heard their warnings that if we walk away from this agreement before even giving it a try, the prospect of further multilateral negotiations yielding any better result is ‘far-fetched.’”
“This agreement is not perfect, but I have personally spoken to leaders representing the P5+1 countries and the European Union who have said quite clearly that if the United States rejects this agreement, they will not join in new negotiations for a better deal,” Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) said on Aug 24.
“There are those who say that we should go back to the negotiating table and try to get a better deal,” Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said on Aug. 25. “I respect that view, but I have heard directly from top ambassadors representing our P5+1 partners as well as members of the administration that starting over is not an option.”
“Earlier this month, several of my colleagues and I met with representatives of our five negotiating partners,” Sen. Thomas Carper (D-Dela.) said on Aug. 28.
“They told us bluntly that if Congress kills this deal, the broad coalition of countries imposing sanctions on Iran would collapse,” he said. “If Congress rejects this deal now, a better one will not take its place, they declared.”
Menendez challenges ‘take it or leave it’ argument
Other JCPOA supporters who mentioned having taken into account the views of the other P5+1 ambassadors included Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Chris Coons (D-Dela.) and Robert Casey (D-Pa.).
(snip)
I sure wish President Trump would come out publicly and excoriate the dems for their non-stop witch hunts against his people. Challenge them to actually get to the work of the American people to make America great again and stop constantly trying to tear down the people he put in place to work hard on our behalf.
I’m wondering if all the praise for Trump after the speech was all part of the media’s ruse. Flower him so much that he’ll stay off Twitter and not fight back.
DO NOT ACCEPT THE MEDIA PROPAGANDA NARATIVE. I want absolutely no recusal— I want nothing but disdain for these hypocrites. Eric Holder did not recuse on “ fast and furious “even after he was held in contempt for failing to provide necessary oversight documents!! Where was the recusal after Loretta Lynch met on the Tarmac with BILL CLINTON!!!???? Holy crap. Where was the recusal when Hillary was taking money from foreign governments and using illegal servers and emails!!?? Where was the recusal for absolute lies told by Hillary on Benghazi??? Give me a damned break!! Tell these hypocrites to go to HELL and tell them real LOUD!!
Everything the Dems do BLOWS UP IN THEIR FACES.........................
That is quite true
Photo at 1:58 of McCaskill meeting with Russian Ambassador. Prior to that a couple of tweets stating that she was off to meet with same. In spite of her current lies claiming that she has never met with same.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRAOjgxeNHg
Maybe Sessions should announce he’s investigating the “Moscow 30” — since his calendar just opened up.
More worrisome would be meetings ANYONE had with the Saudis.
Were these Democrats meeting with Russians will acting as members of a Presidential campaign team?
DON”T FORGET that Sen. Ted kennedy covertly, thru his pupper fool Sen. John Tunnery (D-Ca) told the Soviet leaders that he wanted to work with them to stop Pres. Reagan’s military/nuclear build up against the Soviet threat.
Read about it in Paul Kengor’s book, “DUPES”.
Kennedy also endorsed a KGB/CPUSA/DGI propaganda operation in 1973 known as the “ Congressional Conference on Cuba”. Key article about it in Human Events weekly (I wrote it) and possibly the old Washington Star. Several Democrat congressmen and senators endorsed the fake “conference” (run by the Communist Party USA, i.e. Michael Meyerson and company).
A whole bunch of Democrats endorsed, even with press releases/letters, the CPUSA and Socialist Workers Party “peace” fronts, National Mobilization to End the War in Vietnam, New Mobilization Committee, the CPUSA-split off, Peoples Coalition for Peace & Justice (PCPJ), and the SWP’s front, “National Peace Action Coalition” (NPAC.
All the facts about the reds domination of the “anti-Vietnam” movements’ major organization (i.e above) are in many hearings and studies held and put out by the House Internal Security Committee from 1967 thru 1972.
TIME TO CALL FOR A FULL SCALE INVESTIGATION INTO THE TREASONOUS ACTIVITIES OF THE DEMOCRATS, NOT ONLY IN AIDING HANOI AND ITS AGGRESSION, BUT IN AIDING THEM IN CUBA, NICARAGUA (SEN. HARKIN AND DODD, PLUS KERRY), ANGOLA, THE ANC/SACP IN SOUTH AFRICA, SWAPO (SW AFRICA), EL SALVADOR (FLMN), AND VENEZUELA (CHAVEZ AND MADURO).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.