Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: servo1969

All the militia talk is just a smoke screen. The amendment recognizes the desirability of and the need for a militia. But in no way does it limit keeping and bearing of arms to that militia. What part of “shall not be infringed” do they fail tom understand?


22 posted on 02/27/2017 1:10:52 PM PST by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JimRed

...to understand, of course.


23 posted on 02/27/2017 1:13:46 PM PST by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: JimRed
I come from a long line of NE Yankees, 1630, all males were required to possess arms. To be in the Militia was a given and the requirement to drill with in an age group was also a given.

You were also expected to posses arms before to require familiarity with arms and after to help defend the home turf.

24 posted on 02/27/2017 1:33:02 PM PST by Little Bill (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson