Posted on 02/17/2017 1:54:32 PM PST by Maudeen
What happened to this florist is wrong! Created On: Friday, February 17, 2017 9:23 AM
You may have heard that our friend Barronelle Stutzman lost her case at the Washington state Supreme Court yesterday. Barronelle is the florist from Richland, Washington, who declined to participate in a homosexual wedding ceremony because she said her Christian faith would not allow her to do so. For this the state of Washington came down on her with a lawsuit saying she could not deny her services to LGBT members, even if it violated her religious convictions.
(Excerpt) Read more at afa.net ...
Let your voice be heard here: http://www.afa.net/action-alerts/urgent-ask-pres-trump-to-stand-for-religious-liberty/
ANd when the Supreme Court overturns these travesties of Justice with a 9-0 ruling, I hope and Pray that the Victims of this Religious Jihad SUE EVERY LAST JUDGE FOR DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS under Title 18.
THERE IS PRECEDENT, Tom Hyland of New Mexico received Permission from the Federal Courts to SUE Every Last Person involved in his Driver License Case. AND HE IS
I’m going to self identify as a gay individual and call up the nearest Muslim bakery and order a wedding cake with Mohammed’s picture on it. Their religious beliefs are unimportant and irrelevant, of course.
I agree, the business should have the right to choose their customers as long as they don’t violate the original tenets of the constitution.....
I owned a bakery (recently sold) and still own a Chocolate factory....
I did service all clients for both businesses since I decided early on I wouldn’t pick and choose people by the sin they committed....If I did, I would probably have a very short list of customers. Example: What about a Wedding cake for someone you know committed adultery? The list would be endless...I dealt in green, not sins; that was between my customer and ther God....
But I do heartly support the right for others who believe their belief system to not process orders for those customers.
Better idea?
Take your pick!
Perhaps the shop should have provided flowers in the spirit of Mortisha Adams.
Clear violation of many low number amendments!
Beyond wrong. The _court_ ruling are clearly showing that they; USGov considers ya’ll slaves. How obvious does it get?
Put a big sign over the register:
“100% of all homosexual wedding cake payments to be donated in the gay couples name to Donald Trump 2020 campaign. We welcome your business”
It is a crime what they are doing, and the so called Civil Rights division of DOJ ought to be repurposed to defend Americans supporting their rights, instead of stepping on our rights. Hopefully with an all new staff. The first amendment is first for a reason, and it contains both free speech and freedom of religion.
That may not be a bad idea but how about this:
A sign behind the counter that says,”10% of ALL wedding cake or floral arrangements will be donated to (some get out of being gay organization).”
I do not think this is discriminatory, as all have to pay it.
That could result in some explosive developments.
It's a shame what the libs have turned this state into.
Ed
Simple is always best.
They hate Trump more than anything. They hate him so much it’s driven them insane. Use it against them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.