Posted on 02/14/2017 10:45:17 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Dear anonymous sources,
I must confess, youre helping the mainstream media create some gripping and troubling content.
Im not sure which of your stories stands out the most. Is it the portrait you painted almost two weeks ago, of a president in his bathrobe compulsively watching the news? Yesterdays story of a National Security Council in turmoil, filled with staffers who struggle to make policy to fit President Trumps tweets? The report in Politico that Trumps personnel concerns extend beyond his embattled national security adviser and that Sean Spicer and Reince Priebus may be on the chopping block, with Trump campaign aides drafting lists of possible Priebus replacements? The CNN report that multiple current and former US law enforcement and intelligence officials have corroborated some of the communications detailed in a 35-page dossier compiled by a former British intelligence agent?
The list goes on and on. Youve been leaking relentlessly since the very first days of Trumps presidency, making the president look like a clueless child, as the Washington Posts Chris Cillizza put it. Political Twitter amplifies your voice, with countless concerned citizens retweeting the stories you helped create, appending dire worries that were all going to die.
Youre helping build and sustain an atmosphere of national anxiety and even (in some quarters) outright hysteria. Youre leading us to believe that the nation is in the very worst of hands, with incompetent and malicious people at the helm, ready or even eager to plunge the nation into new wars and completely unable to handle new crises as they emerge.
You may very well be right. Certainly the administrations rollout of its controversial executive order on immigration was a festival of incompetence and cruelty. Theres the compelling and seriously troubling evidence that national-security adviser Michael Flynn may have lied to Vice President Pence about the nature of his contacts with the Russian ambassador to the U.S. The public spectacle of Trump responding to a North Korean missile launch while in the middle of dinner at his resort was bizarre.
Then again, you may well be wrong. Youve led us astray more than once. Youve offered competing and incompatible stories about the allegedly botched special-forces raid in Yemen. A Washington Post blow-by-blow detailing an alleged confrontation between the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, John Kelly, and Trump chief strategist Steve Bannon had to be significantly revised. And lets not forget that one or more of you leaked an excerpt of a transcript of Trumps call with Mexican president Enrique Peña Nieto that made it appear that Trump had threatened to invade Mexico, after which American and Mexican officials alike denied that any such threats were made.
Simply put, I dont trust you, and you havent given me any reason to change my mind. Because you wont go on the record, were left with vague descriptions from reporters. Youre supposedly familiar with the matter. What does that mean, exactly? Some of you have allegedly spoken with the president. Some of you have spoken with those whove spoken with the president. How far down the game of telephone are you? Can we truly believe your claims?
Ive used anonymous sources before, but in a context where I could verify core claims by reference to other, external facts. And I know that anonymous sourcing can be an indispensable aspect of journalism. But lets be honest, this is getting out of hand.
We keep hearing that Trump is a unique threat, that hes violating the norms of constitutional governance and driving our republic straight toward the cliff of autocracy and conflict. But if this is the case, why arent you speaking out on the record so that we can evaluate your credibility and motivations? Why is the fear of reprisals (to quote one New York Times story) driving you so far underground?
Are you worried that Trump might fire you? If you actually do know what youre talking about and have truly valuable insight, youd be unemployed just long enough to appear on Meet the Press and ink a book deal.
Given the gravity of the accusations, your continued anonymity tells me nothing good. The career civil servants among you may be little more than partisan bureaucrats, using hyperbole to fool gullible reporters. The aides and appointees may be mainly jockeying for advantage, hoping to humiliate opponents to gain their own seat at the table. Or, if youre right, and this president truly is dangerous, your anonymity raises concerns about your courage. Men and women have died for this nation, and youre not willing to risk your GS rating to save it from incompetence or authoritarianism?
One of the reasons why the public has lost trust in the so-called elite is that it often appears that theyre far more interested in protecting their own careers than in serving the public. Using the press to fight your bureaucratic wars does nothing to dispel that perception. If you believe this president is a menace, go on the record. Give the public a chance to test your credibility. If airing the truth is that important to you, its the least you can do.
David French is a staff writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and an attorney.
The author calls out the leakers & elites, but still gets his jabs in on Pres. Trump.
Sorry but the mainstream media doesn’t exist anymore so stop calling them that.
It’s alt-left
I didn’t use the term “main stream media”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.