Except that the article is misrepresenting the location of the robot. It was inside the containment. It was not inside the reactor. Big difference.
Once again we’re served BS by journalists exaggerating a humdrum event to something extraordinarily worrisome in order to qualify it as “If it bleeds it leads.”
>Once again we’re served BS by journalists exaggerating a humdrum event to something extraordinarily worrisome
You are Exactly right.
The solution resides with experience, not politics.