Does the Establishment Plan to Defeat Trump Via Impeachment?

The New American ^ | 09 February 2017 | Selwyn Duke

[LS]

Every day, new job announcements are expanding that support base. I bet if the election were today, Trump would win NH and ME and possibly MN as well. All of his margins would be higher in the blue states.

[gundog]

Pence/Walker2019. Is that what they want?

[preacher]

later

[caseinpoint]

I agree. The Democrats lost the bully pulpit because they became the bully party. Now they are simply strengthening that fact in the minds of normal people who just want to get along in life.

[Ozark Tom]

Congress members probably aren’t accustomed to looking over their shoulder everywhere they go. Should they make the wrong play, they may incur the downside of needing head-of-state like security.

[major-pelham]

I’ll admit I can’t soundly think this problem through today, too much other work. I’m glad we’ve the right guy at the helm to do so.

Perhaps an address to the Nation explaining the absurdity of extending Constitutional Rights to folks from Sudan, explaining the absurdity that a Judge in Seattle can shut down the country’s National Security apparatus and what that means for all of us. Further explain the Appellate process a little bit too to the citizenry where the 9th’s 3 judge panel totally ignored the Statue Trump operated under, ignored the rules on TRO’s, gave standing for paying for three Visas, extended the Bill of Rights to non-citizens, and declared that they could nullify any act of Congress or the Executive in peacetime, wartime or on Immigration.

That predicate might set the stage for disobeying. He has to disobey what they said, it’s too whacky. If he does disobey it plays into the libtard mantra that he’s a madman. But it’s the judges that are the madmen.

[Theodore R.]

Clinton was indeed impeached, but the American people think he was NOT impeached because T. Lott, “R”-MS, botched the trial.