Posted on 02/08/2017 5:10:24 PM PST by markomalley
So many idiots, so little time...
( R B G n Company )
The Constitution and liberal judges are not friends.
But, then again, the term “liberal judge” is the very example of an oxymoron.
Oh yes, Ruth, let’s go with the National Popular Vote - you know, that thing that is not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution. That thing that has never been used, not once, in the history of our nation. Not to choose a president. Not to ratify or amend the Constitution. Not to pass a law. Never. Not once.
Good luck with that. I’m sure the other 49 states will be more than willing to allow California to choose the president every election.
When’s her funeral?
already been embalmed
Proof that Liberalism is a mental disease.
The idiot Ginsberg is not fit to be a Supreme Court Justice
The EC is a big wall against vote fraud. It’s been keeping S0r0$ at bay for a while now.
They are heretics, anti-American commie bastards who will do anything to win. We must be eternally vigilant against them.
Idiot Ginsberg is not fit to clean toilets.
By doing this, she has just labeled the Supreme Court as a ‘circus’ the same as the 9th District Court...they are called ‘clowns’ and it is called a ‘circus’ and rightfully so...
She needs to go to pasture and I hope she takes that idiot Warren, who thinks she's part Indian, Pelosi who runs a Pizza Shop, and Maxine Waters who doesn't have a lick of sense on any matter whatsoever...
I have NEVER seen such stupid people in my life, and I have worked and met a lot of people in my life, as ignorant as our government people...(excluding President Trump and our new administration)....
God forgive us for putting our heads in the sand for so long, I just hope and pray we can save this Country!!!
If the Democrats had won this election killing the Electoral College would have been easy. With that 5th Communist Justice, they simply “overturn” it i.e. declare it Unconstitutional. The Republicans would complain that that wasn’t a wise thing to do.
She makes Keith Richards look good .
How so? She sees her interest — what will get her what she wants — and she goes after it. She wants New York and California to have greater weight in determining the president and she chooses a means to give them that weight.
OK,fair enough...she's entitled to have an opinion.Assuming that it's proper for a SC Justice to publicly state such an opinion then I'm sure she knows how it can be done:
A two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives *and* the Senate...and then approval by thirty eight State Legislatures.
It's hard for *me* to imagine even a dozen state legislatures approving this.
In the 1960 World Series the losing team scored more than twice as many runs as the winning team, as the Yankees won three blowout games (16–3, 10–0, and 12–0), while the Pirates won four close games (6–4, 3–2, 5–2, and 10–9). Regardless of how many runs the Yankees had the Pirates won the series by winning the most games. How many Yankees fans have been mocked over the decades for claiming they really won the 1960 World Series because they had more runs? Even the brain dead liberal's at ESPN can understand the Yankees lost under the rules. And in this case: Ginsberg
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.