Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court nominee Gorsuch calls Trump's tweets 'disheartening'
CNN ^ | 02/08/2017 | By Ashley Killough, CNN

Posted on 02/08/2017 2:27:55 PM PST by Responsibility2nd

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-147 next last
To: snarkytart
Woo hooo another weak-kneed conservative!!! congratulations letting the media get inside your head?

Grow up. Seriously, I know I am in the minority here, but one can wish Trump would tone down the tweeting, while still being a tough guy Conservative. I do, and I am, or would you like to take this outside? LOL. I actually think, because Trump plays 12 dimensional Chess, that this comment by Gorsuch is a GOOD thing, because it makes him look more "Judgely" and independent from the President. Trump done good again, yessiree bob.

61 posted on 02/08/2017 3:32:55 PM PST by Paradox ("Donald Trump", the biggest Strawman ever created.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd; All

It might be BS. Let’s wait to see if Trump replies.


62 posted on 02/08/2017 3:34:49 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

http://dailycaller.com/2010/10/05/richard-blumenthal-lied-and-it-should-matter/

“When the scandal first broke, Blumenthal spoke to veterans at a VFW hall in West Hartford, where he called his lie “absolutely unintentional.” “On a few occasions, I have misspoken about my service, and I regret that, and I take full responsibility.”


63 posted on 02/08/2017 3:35:02 PM PST by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

So, the spokesperson guiding Gorsuch through the nominating process says that he DID, in fact, say this.

That’s definitely troubling.

What in the world have we come to if a black and white, very straightforward statute has to be parsed and argued over with every little interpreted nuance?

I long for the ‘good ole days’ when words meant what they clearly said.


64 posted on 02/08/2017 3:37:41 PM PST by jstolzen (All it takes for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Conversation probably went like this, a question from Blumenthal to Gorsuch: “Do you agree that the tweets from the President regarding the judiciary are ‘demoralizing’ and ‘disheartening’?”
Gorsuch answer: “Yes, I would agree with that characterization.”

CNN poses the loaded question and jumps to broadcast the answer as the Judge’s words.

Then CNN reports: “Judge Gorsuch said the tweets are ‘demoralizing’ and ‘disheartening’.”


65 posted on 02/08/2017 3:38:52 PM PST by CedarDave (Proud member of Hillary's Deplorables class of 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Fox News led with this on their 6 O’clock program.


66 posted on 02/08/2017 3:38:54 PM PST by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

It has been confirmed now by Gorsuch’s spokesman.


67 posted on 02/08/2017 3:40:37 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lafroste

Add NBC to the list.


68 posted on 02/08/2017 3:40:51 PM PST by Pinkbell (http://dtforpres.blogspot.com/2016/11/cnn-lies-multiple-times-to-help-hillary.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Nicely played. Now the Dems will vote for him. Or maybe enough to turn it.


69 posted on 02/08/2017 3:49:01 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

The comment all but ensures his confirmation. Absolutely brilliant 3D chess move by Trump/Gorsuch.


70 posted on 02/08/2017 3:56:43 PM PST by huckfillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

Yep. Besides, it’s counterproductive.


71 posted on 02/08/2017 3:59:50 PM PST by SE Mom (Screaming Eagle mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

I agree. In this twitter situation, our President should not be making snarky comments about the Judges deciding his EO. Not smart to demean a set of Judges deciding the fate of your EO.

Would a lawyer waiting on a Judge to decide his court case really go out in public and call that Judge snarky names to the media and then expect a favorable ruling? NO.


72 posted on 02/08/2017 4:00:33 PM PST by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

He’s probably disheartened that we have such bad judges that the president needs to comment on them. That’s probably closer to what he may have really said.


73 posted on 02/08/2017 4:03:06 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Engedi

The judge already decided when the President made his comment.


74 posted on 02/08/2017 4:10:04 PM PST by hotsteppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Engedi

These are not real judges. These are partisan hacks who hold judicial power that they wield to wage a coup against our elected officials who passed laws we want. Real judges don’t assume powers they do not have under the Constitution.


75 posted on 02/08/2017 4:11:33 PM PST by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
It has been confirmed now by Gorsuch’s spokesman.

Is there video/audio/writings from this spokesman to confirm any of this? What exactly did the spokesman say?

76 posted on 02/08/2017 4:12:44 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

.
Fakers faking.


77 posted on 02/08/2017 4:13:01 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

A simple “I have no comment” would have sufficed, Mr. Gorsuch.


78 posted on 02/08/2017 4:14:50 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Engedi
I agree. In this twitter situation, our President should not be making snarky comments about the Judges deciding his EO. Not smart to demean a set of Judges deciding the fate of your EO.

I don't think Trump or anyone else in the WH was under any illusion on how the 9'th circus will rule on this, so no harm done at all. Too many judges have been legislating from the bench, and I see a benefit to calling them on it these days. It's an issue that needs to be brought to light.

79 posted on 02/08/2017 4:17:44 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF

It is a brilliant move for the Judge. In effect he is campaigning in the Senate for election to a job in an equal piece of Govt. So showing independence is a great move to get to 60 votes

Trump won’t yank him. He is way too qualified and that would be a horrible move

What I thought was funny was the Dem Senator from CT was talking about a “private”!conversation he had with the judge. Pure class. Have a private chat and then run looking for a camera. That is what burns me up. There is no integrity anymore. All is fair in love and war they say.


80 posted on 02/08/2017 4:18:38 PM PST by Jimmy The Snake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson