Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/07/2017 3:57:25 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Brad from Tennessee

Thank goodness the RAND corporation is out there to study such things. I bet most of the Army will be utterly blindsided to learn that the A-10 is so effective and critical.

Wonder how much we paid for this study?


2 posted on 02/07/2017 4:06:43 PM PST by DesertRhino (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Less diplomacy, more WartHogs!
3 posted on 02/07/2017 4:11:17 PM PST by heterosupremacist (Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Little known, affordable proposed (but not bought) replacement for the A-10, Ares, designed by Burt Rutan:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zG9LlHcX8lg

Many unusual features.

Don’t jump on me, like you I am nuts about the A-10 and want them to live forever....


5 posted on 02/07/2017 4:17:40 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

There is no reason to retire the airframe of the A-10. All the Air Force needs to do is analyze past battle damage where the A-10 airframe failed, and the to fix it. They also need to focus on implementing modularized and improved electronics and software. Another focus should be on engine improvements for fuel economy, power, reliability, and survivability

In the natural world there is a reason all birds have a similar, basic profile regardless if they eat seeds or meat - the physics of flight are not impressed by flights of fantasy. Once an airframe has evolved to optimum flight characteristics for a given mission, the possible future aerodynamic improvements are minimal. After that gains are made with lighter, stronger materials, weight savings, and improvements to electronics and software.


7 posted on 02/07/2017 4:20:02 PM PST by WMarshal (President Trump, a president keeping his promises to the American people. It feels like winning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

The Air Force hates them, though. They seem to hate any Close Air Support. Don’t know why.


9 posted on 02/07/2017 4:22:58 PM PST by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Best damn attack aircraft since the F-51


10 posted on 02/07/2017 4:23:39 PM PST by Don Corleone (.leave the gun, take the canolis, take it to the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Just a guess.
It would do wonders on our southern borders


12 posted on 02/07/2017 4:28:30 PM PST by South Dakota (We need a real independent investigation of Bill/Hillary and Obama's actions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

IF you’ve ever seen on of these bad boys in action, you don’t need no stinkin’ “study” to understand just how good this machine does it’s job. But, hey, If the study keeps em flying, the more, the better. A-10s are great and saved a lot of our boys’ hides.


15 posted on 02/07/2017 4:56:36 PM PST by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

“RAND noted that regarding other aircraft such as the F-16 Fighting Falcon and B-1 Lancer, a fast-moving jet bomber, “weapon use and enemy killed tended … to be somewhat lower than those for the A-10.”

Low and Slow. Time over target. Warthogs are the close air support weapon of choice and the infantry knows it.


18 posted on 02/07/2017 5:17:27 PM PST by Pelham (liberate Occupied California)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee
...the aircraft’s ability to fly low and slow, giving the pilot enough time to line up and strafe with the plane’s 30-millimeter rotary cannon...

Was stationed at Myrtle Beach when they replaced their A-7s with the A-10s. Not only can they go in low and slow, but they can turn around so quick that by the time those who ducked get around to raising their heads again, it's coming back and firing from the opposite direction.

Amazing to watch them go through their maneuvers - almost surreal.

41 posted on 02/08/2017 2:38:49 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Pfl


44 posted on 02/16/2017 6:51:04 AM PST by outofsalt ( If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson