Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MOM FURIOUS AFTER DAYCARE WORKER BREASTFED HER SON
ABC11.com ^ | 2/7/17 | Andrea Blanford

Posted on 02/07/2017 10:31:35 AM PST by Rebelbase

[snip] CARRBORO, North Carolina (WTVD) -- A mother is hoping police press charges against a daycare worker she says was caught on surveillance video breastfeeding her child without her permission.

Oxendine said moments after she left the room, video shows the daycare worker picking up her baby and breastfeeding him for several seconds. The woman stopped when another worker who was in the room at the time, stood up to leave.

Later Friday evening, Oxendine rushed her baby to UNC Hospital because she said he became ill and was throwing up.

Her son was born prematurely, is lactose intolerant and can't have any milk products.

(Excerpt) Read more at abc11.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: daycare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
Once you walk out of the Day Care you have no idea what is going on inside.
1 posted on 02/07/2017 10:31:35 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

I guess Wet Nurse is a dying profession.


2 posted on 02/07/2017 10:34:19 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

weirdos. take “no” for an answer.


3 posted on 02/07/2017 10:38:40 AM PST by ronniesgal (hey move on over, snowflakes. the adults are in charge again!!!!! God Bless our President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

I disbelieve the facts in this story. My thought is that the mother is a freak. She probably does believe her baby is lactose intolerant. The baby may even be lactose intolerant, but she is looking for a lawsuit.


4 posted on 02/07/2017 10:38:57 AM PST by Glad2bnuts (If Republicans are not prepared to carry on the Revolution of 1776, prepare for a communist takeover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Look out, since the baby is a boy, they will label him a Sex Offender for the rest of his life.


5 posted on 02/07/2017 10:40:59 AM PST by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

My thoughts, too.


6 posted on 02/07/2017 10:42:39 AM PST by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticides, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Who knows. They may not have a good understanding of their market.


7 posted on 02/07/2017 10:44:27 AM PST by Portcall24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

3-2-1...cue the We Were Soldiers scene...


8 posted on 02/07/2017 10:47:19 AM PST by Mashood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Wet nurse would probably be just fine if the parent had approved it. This does not appear to be the case. Therefore this is either simple or sexual assault, depending on the prosecutor and local statues.

CC


9 posted on 02/07/2017 10:47:31 AM PST by Celtic Conservative (CC: purveyor of cryptic, snarky posts since December, 2000..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

It’s bigger than just one mom trying to help another mom.
The teachers had noticed the infant was constipated.
One of the teachers offered to nurse the child. The mother said ‘No’ That’s not what I want”. When the mom left the room, the assistant teacher did it anyway. Wouldn’t you know it, of all times to nurse a baby. This baby is lactose intolerant, and doesn’t use milk products. This ‘favor’ made the child sick enough to see a doctor. So, this is an inadvertent form of insubordination and even arrogance, albeit well meaning.

I noticed there is no father mentioned. It’s possible this is a single mom, who may already be feeling somewhat inadequate with no dad, now she sees an unrelated woman taking charge of her baby. Doubling the resentment.
Sometimes, no means no.


10 posted on 02/07/2017 10:47:51 AM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

not true.

Reputable day cares have monitors parents can watch what is going on. At least it’s that way in some daycares.

Today we have plenty of baby monitors/cameras that parents can watch babysitters, pet sitters, repairmen in their homes too.


11 posted on 02/07/2017 10:49:54 AM PST by b4me (If Jesus came to set us free, why are so many professed Believers still in chains?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

That’s right. Why leave your precious child in the care of strangers?


12 posted on 02/07/2017 10:53:17 AM PST by Bigg Red (The best f-word we can apply to Obama on this glorious inauguration day is "former".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

The baby was premature and had medical issues...and she LEFT him among strangers?


13 posted on 02/07/2017 10:53:36 AM PST by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

Mothers can pass on diseases or drug use via their breast milk. I hope this person was healthy and the child does not pick up something.


14 posted on 02/07/2017 10:59:04 AM PST by kiltie65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Breastfed him for several seconds and he started throwing up? Hmmm...


15 posted on 02/07/2017 11:00:19 AM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

I agree with your take on it.


16 posted on 02/07/2017 11:00:26 AM PST by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

“I guess Wet Nurse is a dying profession.”

My sister belonged to a group of nursing mothers, they would meet to nurse each others babes!

This is in a very nice suburb, the thinking was this has benefits for the children.


17 posted on 02/07/2017 11:00:48 AM PST by DUMBGRUNT (Go Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

I have no idea what this woman’s situation is, but if she is a single mother, her choices would have been to either keep her job and put her son in day care, or stay home with her son but mooch off the taxpayers to do it. Which one of these scenarios would you prefer?


18 posted on 02/07/2017 11:03:47 AM PST by bus man (Loose Lips Sink Ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kiltie65

Good point. Sounds like the exposure was fortunately fairly brief.

CC


19 posted on 02/07/2017 11:06:38 AM PST by Celtic Conservative (CC: purveyor of cryptic, snarky posts since December, 2000..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

She should be at home with taxpayers supporting her and her baby. Would that make you feel better?


20 posted on 02/07/2017 11:07:25 AM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson