Posted on 02/05/2017 5:44:09 AM PST by Red Steel
Very well put!
I found most interesting the judge relying on the Texas ruling that stopped Obama’s DACA.
Why? Because there is Constitutional authority for the President to be more restrictive than Congress legislates, yet only practical justification for him to be less restrictive, IE: he doesn’t have the money.
No disagreements from me.
...and you are a dick.
US Court of Appeals For The 9th Circuit (Trump’s Emergency Motion Schedule)
I sometimes wonder why we go through all the bother of elections when it appears that the country is run by the judicial arm. The judiciary has been infested with the progressive arm of the democrat party. They seem to be making all the decisions, and to hell with the people.
Yeah, but at least some are Repub appointees - the odds would be better. You may get a few honest ones from the Dem side. Right now, with the 2 that made the decision, it is 100% Dem.
This will result in a quick overturn of the Seattle judge’s blatant unconstitutional ruling.
And the Washington governor approved of the suit.
I knew it was a dumb question.
The Left won’t stop destroying the country until they’re completely voted/deposed out of all 3 branches. Then, their next move: see Berkeley.
No doubt about it. But for Trump to cleaning out I do not think he can just fire them These folks belong to Unions and it is not only the supervisors involved.
Oh, grow up.
Why isn't this "contract" subject to an implied condition of compliance with federal law governing entry into the country and the acceptance/performance of work?
What sort of record could there have been to find "arbitrariness"sufficient to overcome a compelling state interest?
Also, the people already here don’t have to get their visas renewed.
Dumb but sincere question: if the 4-4 Supremes kill the travel ban, why doesn’t Congress pass this into law? It’ll take a few weeks, but at least make it Plan B.>>> there already is a law. it just needs to be able to be enforced. this is a coup.
I believe they could slow walk (effectively slow down to a stop) visa issuance in any country they choose. Nothing any stateside judge can do about that, I would think.>>>. yes you missed form 99944586. but this has to be filed after form 9883485.. so you need to refile in order and then we have a 120 approval time. thx.
Exactly. I see you understand the protocol.
And, Mr. Yemeni applicant, you forgot to fill out line 923 in form 99966632, which will cause a two-month further delay.
For the Democrats it is surely is. They view this as an existential issue. Its their long term path to permanent control of the government. And for a judge that does pro bono work for immigrants, I strongly suspect that his sympathies led him to view this as an immigration issue as well.
...WA Fed judge ruled on the issue of property impairment. That is, the plaintiffs argued they had contractual obligations that were being arbitrarily compromised.
Those companies did not sue; they filed an amicus brief. With respect to contractual obligations, many of those same companies currently have contracts with the federal government that can be terminated at the mere convenience of the government. They have no recourse to that decision. The states brought suit and they did so on the basis of immigration. The Boston judge who agreed with the Trump administration also made his ruling on the basis of immigration (i.e., whether or not the policy was discriminatory).
The underlying reasons for this whole mess are about immigration.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.