[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

So 5 years ago scumbag leftist pukes cheered that the Feds are in charge of immigration law and states should shut the Hell up, but now the shoe's on the other foot they want to pretend this ruling doesn't exist and are suddenly in favor of state rights backed by radical judicial activism.

[Dilbert San Diego]

This was a case in which John Roberts voted with the liberals. Just saying............

[Logical me]

This current judge that made this ruling should be taken of the Federal bench. He is a idiot and does not know the law on immigration. The House should be impeach him.

[tumblindice]

They can’t have it both ways.

[UCANSEE2]

“...set immigration policy and laws.”

But no responsibility to actually follow them ?

[snarkytart]

I think we’re all states rights people here with a few exceptions and border control and military are those exceptions. Protecting our borders, infrastructure and military action is really three of the main things a Federal Government SHOULD control.

[FlingWingFlyer]

How much longer are these pedophile "judges" in their phony baloney courts going to side with the criminals against the citizens?

...the court's 5-3 ruling upheld the authority of the federal government to set immigration policy and laws.

And then another fag feral "judge" turns around today and says, "No, the states have that authority." These friggin' bottom feeding "judges" have got to go.

[Republican Wildcat]

I thought about this the other day. Quite a timely post, yet again demonstrating everything the Left does is staged, phony, and false. And this Supreme Court ruling can be used as precedent in any attempt by localities to litigate against enforcement of immigration laws in their effort to defy the administration.