Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SharpRightTurn

Yes, its not bad, but rather than guarantee “no cancellation” — simply enforce contracts.

People need to make sure policies they buy do not include cancellation clauses.

Moreover, developed steps to let a CASH system develop, rather than 3rd party insurance. 3rd party paying will automatically make it more complicated, and provide rich pickings for nanny-state activism. Remember before Obamacare how much we were told by Progs that we “hate” insurance companies?

Many illnesses are chronic, or not life-threatening. Wouldn’t it be ideal if I could just compare costs of various doctors and clinics to pay in CASH for a procedure I might want?


7 posted on 02/01/2017 10:45:01 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: PGR88

“Yes, its not bad, but rather than guarantee “no cancellation” — simply enforce contracts. People need to make sure policies they buy do not include cancellation clauses.

“Moreover, developed steps to let a CASH system develop, rather than 3rd party insurance. ...

“Many illnesses are chronic, or not life-threatening. Wouldn’t it be ideal if I could just compare costs of various doctors and clinics to pay in CASH for a procedure I might want?”

All excellent points. I agree.


12 posted on 02/01/2017 11:56:34 AM PST by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson