Posted on 01/31/2017 6:06:48 PM PST by i88schwartz
Matthews said politics have become so polarized that is natural to assume there will be a filibuster against Judge Gorsuch.
"I think this is going to come down, to a sad denouement," Matthews said Wednesday night. "I think it's going to take 60 votes to get this approved and I think the Republicans will have their rank-and-file 52 votes will be there. But I don't think the Democrats are going to give them a single vote which mean this will go to a filibuster."
"I don't think they'll get 60 votes because I don't think they'll get a single Democratic vote, Chris. Not a one," Matthews said.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
Those senators are between a rock and a hard place. They may well lose if they don’t support President Trump’s nominee, but if they do, they may well get primaried.
Well, I always want them gone, but particularly if they are going to block good stuff like this nomination.
Gorsuch, an Episcopalian, will join a SCOTUS that is currently 5 Catholics + 3 Jews. I hope Dems are stupid enough to try to torpedo the only Protestant, especially one with the stellar credentials and experience of Gorsuch.
Democrats have a religious test for Supreme Court judges.
Amen!
They were gathered on the steps of the Supreme Court building with a podium, sound system and lighting before Trump made the announcement.
in red states:
Wisconsin Senator Tammy Baldwin (D)
Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown (D)
Pennsylvania Senator Bob Casey Jr. (D)
Indiana Senator Joe Donnelly (D)
North Dakota Senator Heidi Heitkamp (D)
West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin (D)
Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill (D)
Florida Senator Bill Nelson (D)
Michigan Senator Debbie Stabenow (D)
Montana Senator Jon Tester (D)
To these 10 Democrat senators in red states, I would add possible pickups or possible flips on the nomination at least on cloture:
New Mexico Senator Martin Heinrich (D)
Virginia Senator Tim Kaine (D)
Maine Senator Angus King (I)
This amounts to 13 Democrat senators and, assuming the Republicans hold all of their own, Republicans would need 9 Democrats to break the filibuster. I have heard it reported that 7 Democrats have declared they would not vote to sustain a filibuster although I have no idea who they might be.
If so, the Republicans need only 2 more Democrats to break the filibuster, the odds of breaking the filibuster are therefore high, the odds against the Democrats initiating a filibuster have just improved.
Mitch McConnell has declined to say that he will go nuclear but evidently minority leader Schumer has declared that the Democrats will filibuster. If McConnell fails to go nuclear to save this nominee it will cause a huge rupture in the Republican Party with significance for the 2018 election and probably cost McConnell is control of the Senate. In any event, McConnell has said that the nominee will be confirmed, leaving himself exposed if the filibuster is not broken while McConnell sits passive.
My view is the filibuster should be done away with because the Democrats will simply invoke it or dismiss it as it conveniences them and by retaining it we simply forfeit the initiative and the timing to Democrats. It is time all Republican senators candidly told the people that since Robert Bork every nomination is purely an ideological test and it has been such on the left but, sadly, a it has been a pandering fest on the right. It is time Republicans told their constituents they were joining the battle and not conceding the field when Democrat presidents nominate. The filibuster has been no use to Republicans and it has too often in too many guises served only to give cover to Rinos.
I want them gone anyway. Hasn’t done any good.
Sigh.
;-)
Amen!! Make them feel the heat!! Don’t go nuclear until these Democrats that up for re-election positively says they will vote NO.....THEN go NUCLEAR!!
Kaine has gone on the record as abetting obstruction at every turn, so I wouldn’t count on him.
Yes, I support the nuclear option if there’s no way to get to 60. It’s time Democrats are hoisted on their own petards. They started this mess with implementing the nuclear option on other judgeships and legislation. Obama also took executive orders to new and outrageous heights. Let them be on the receiving end for a change because any objection they have can be thrown back in their faces. Eventually, maybe a truce can be implemented, but not now.
There are rumblings from some more reasonable Democrats that Gorsuch should not be the hill on which they deploy and expend all their energy - that they should save it for the next choice, presumably Ginsburg.
Then there are others, supported by editorials in the NYSlimes and elsewhere that this seat was stolen from Garland and the GOP has to pay for that.
Some will vote for him, but not eight. Not right away.
Then we bring in the Nuke rule.
Stupid a$$ Schumer talks of vetting and slowing down the process for Trumps SCOTUS and other nominees but not for refugeess coming from war torn areas/countries. Let that sink in. He wants to halt/pause/defeat the nominations more than he wants to find out who is coming into the country and for what reasons.
-—It is likely that Thomas and perhaps Kennedy will step up and retire.-—
Imagine if they both did it at the same time...!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.