Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Narrative Fail: Overwhelming Support for President Trump’s “America First” Inaugural Address
Conservative Treehouse ^ | January 26, 2017 | Sundance

Posted on 01/26/2017 9:04:38 AM PST by detective

If you listened to the media narrative, the inaugural address by President Trump was filled with doom and gloom. Most MSM pundits labeling the speech “dark“, “foreboding”, “negative” or “divisive“. Some even called it “out of touch” and  “dystopian“. Except, there’s a problem,…

….the vast majority of American’s liked it.

(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: inauguration; media; trump
Trump gave a great speech at the inauguration.

The American people loved it.

The media hated it.

1 posted on 01/26/2017 9:04:38 AM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: detective

Fake news media haven’t yet figured out that they are IRRELEVANT!


2 posted on 01/26/2017 9:07:55 AM PST by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

I liked Dr. Laura Schlessinger’s take on it.

“I watched John Kennedy’s inauguration....ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country. It was poetic.

Ronald Reagan.....Poetic. President Obama.....Poetic.

I watched President Trump’s inaugural address. It was NOT poetic.

That was John Wayne, and I LOVED it!”


3 posted on 01/26/2017 9:08:14 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Ya what’s going on? The media told us it was a dark speech a fearful view of the future under Trump etc. I wondered if the liberals were seeing the same speech,as their view was so different.


4 posted on 01/26/2017 9:09:00 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

The pundit class has been wrong for two solid years. Whatever they say the opposite is true


5 posted on 01/26/2017 9:09:07 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
"Dystopian?"

What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people.

"Divisive?"

We are one nation and their pain is our pain. Their dreams are our dreams. And their success will be our success. We share one heart, one home, and one glorious destiny. The oath of office I take today is an oath of allegiance to all Americans.

6 posted on 01/26/2017 9:10:00 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
"Every new regulation concerning commerce or revenue; or in any manner affecting the value of the different species of property, presents a new harvest to those who watch the change and can trace its consequences; a harvest reared not by themselves but by the toils and cares of the great body of their fellow citizens. This is a state of things in which it may be said with some truth that laws are made for the few not for the many." - Federalist Papers, No. 62, February 27, 1788

"It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man who knows what the law is today can guess what it will be tomorrow." - Federalist Papers, No. 62, February 27, 1788

Note particularly the following words of wisdom from Federalist No. 63, and take heart. According to Madison:

"As the cool and deliberate sense of the community ought, in all governments, and actually will, in all free governments, ultimately prevail over the views of its rulers; so there are particular moments in public affairs when the people, stimulated by some irregular passion, or some illicit advantage, or misled by the artful misrepresentations of interested men, may call for measures which they themselves will afterwards be the most ready to lament and condemn. In these critical moments, how salutary will be the interference of some temperate and respectable body of citizens, in order to check the misguided career, and to suspend the blow meditated by the people against themselves, until reason, justice, and truth can regain their authority over the public mind?" - Federalist Papers, No. 63, 1788

 

7 posted on 01/26/2017 9:19:51 AM PST by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Trump sounds like Pat Buchanan with America first except Trump’s Bibi first.


8 posted on 01/26/2017 9:26:46 AM PST by ex-snook (The one true God sent Jesus here to show us the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

That’s a great quote!!


9 posted on 01/26/2017 9:27:44 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: detective

yes they did, www.MaineTV.net which has the speech transcript and video has had over 100,000 hits since Friday.


10 posted on 01/26/2017 9:36:42 AM PST by The_Republic_Of_Maine (politicians beware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

We haven’t had a Pro-American President since Reagan.

It’s refreshing to most people who are not in favor off subverting American sovereignty.


11 posted on 01/26/2017 9:39:00 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

The media hated it .. because Trump called out all the LEFTY organizations and government employees who did nothing but “dis” the USA, and promote all the criminal, illegal and terrorist organizations.

The whole speech was a REBUKE OF THE LEFT - THAT’S WHY THE MEDIA WAS WHINING ABOUT IT - THEY WERE BEING EXPOSED - AND OF COURSE THE TRUMP VOTERS LOVED IT.


12 posted on 01/26/2017 9:51:55 AM PST by CyberAnt (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Re: “Divisive”

I watched Neil Cavuto conduct three or four interviews after the speech. He asked each one, “Some are saying this was a divisive speech. What do you think?”

The next guest would come on after a commercial break, and he’d ask: “So, this has been called a divisive speech. What do you say to that?”

This is how the media controls the news, rather than gathering it.

It’s also why I didn’t watch Cavuto conduct five, six, or seven interviews.


13 posted on 01/26/2017 10:17:14 AM PST by Chad N. Freud (FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

bkmk


14 posted on 01/26/2017 10:50:56 AM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

My first reaction while listening to the speech was:

This is George Effing Washington!

Only I wasn’t so polite.


15 posted on 01/26/2017 11:32:18 AM PST by AZLiberty (A is now A once again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson