Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems to David Brock: Stop Helping, You Are Killing Us
www.thedailybeast.com ^ | 01.26.17 12:05 AM ET | Asawin Suebsaeng

Posted on 01/26/2017 6:45:00 AM PST by Red Badger

Democrats know they need someone to lead them out of the wilderness. But, they say, that someone is not David Brock.

As David Brock attempts to position himself as a leader in rebuilding a demoralized Democratic Party in the age of Trump, many leading Democratic organizers and operatives are wishing the man would simply disappear.

Many in the party—Clinton loyalists, Obama veterans, and Bernie supporters alike—talk about the man not as a sought-after ally in the fight against Trumpism, but as a nuisance and a hanger-on, overseeing a colossal waste of cash. And former employees say that he has hurt the cause.

In the weeks since Donald Trump pulled off a surprise victory over Hillary Clinton, party stalwarts have scrambled to identify key figures for a robust revitalization in a post-Obama era.

Brock, founder of the media watchdog Media Matters for America and liberal super PACs American Bridge and Correct the Record, has volunteered himself to lead the reconstruction, vowing to “kick Donald Trump’s ass.”

During Trump’s inauguration weekend, Brock held a conference for activists, politicians, and donors at a resort in South Florida to pitch his grand vision. All but one of the candidates currently running to chair the Democratic National Committee attended, conspicuously missing the Women’s March on Washington on Saturday.

Meanwhile, many Democratic grassroots activists and campaign alums have been giving his proposed plans some stern side-eye.

“His ability to produce wins for Democrats is nonexistent,” Jeff Weaver, former campaign manager for Bernie Sanders’s 2016 presidential run, told The Daily Beast. “He does not have the kind of understanding of what kind of coalition you have to bring together to win national races—that’s his fundamental problem.”

During the 2016 election, Brock and his network positioned themselves as prominent allies to the Clinton campaign, generating opposition research, stunts, and ads against Trump, and supporting Clinton in the primary.

Brock bragged early last year that his team had assembled a mountain of damning oppo that could “knock Trump Tower down to the sub-basement.” But Trump Tower still stands, and Brock’s groups failed to help Clinton to victory.

Brock, for his part, is unfazed by the criticisms.

“People are free to question my motives, but it should be pretty clear by now that the groups that I’ve created are committed to a more progressive America,” Brock told The Daily Beast in a phone interview on Wednesday. “I’m interested in building third-party organizational capacity to resist and oppose Donald Trump. I think that should be everybody’s goal on the left, to destroy Donald Trump, not to destroy each other.”

It’s clear why Brock has acquired a long list of enemies on the more progressive corners of his own party. Brock’s political evolution is well-known: the former anti-Clinton right-winger who starting in the late 1990s transformed into a relentlessly pro-Clinton Democratic operative.

But the friction between Brock and Democrats is not merely limited to its more progressive faction—many alumni of Obama’s campaigns and White House, as well as Hillary Clinton’s failed 2016 run, say they want Brock to stay far away from the Democrats’ future plans.

“I don’t think David Brock has been helpful to the party to date, and I don’t think he will be a big part of its future,” a former senior Clinton campaign official told The Daily Beast. “And it’s surprising that many other people don’t see it that way.”

Another senior 2016 Clinton aide, who asked not to be named because the ex-staffer did “not want to deal with Brock’s bullshit,” described Brock and his organizations in 2016 as “useless—you might as well have thrown those [tens of] millions of dollars down a well, and then set the well on fire.”

Two sources told The Daily Beast that in the last couple of months Brock and his team reached out to former Clinton campaign officials, including ex-national press secretary Brian Fallon, to join Brock’s new anti-Trump “war room.” All, however, declined the offer simply because “no one wants anything to do with him,” one source recalled. (Fallon did not respond to a request for comment.)

Brock and his teams also became staunch allies of the Obama reelection campaign and the Obama White House. Brock would throw lavish parties where Team Obama figures would make appearances and liberally sip the champagne—still, it wasn’t hard to find former White House dwellers who questioned Brock’s usefulness.

“I met with I’m a couple times—he’s fucking weird,” a former Obama administration official, who also requested anonymity, told The Daily Beast. “I felt like I was meeting Mugatu from Zoolander… I don’t know what the fuck [Brock’s network] did besides raise a ton of money, and I don’t think the after-action report on 2016 says we need more David Brock. Probably the opposite is true.”

Tommy Vietor, a veteran of the 2008 Obama campaign who later served as a National Security Council spokesman, on the other hand took a more generous approach to Brock’s Media Matters, noting that it was “a very smart and well-executed idea,” but conceded that Brock himself “hasn’t proved his expertise in campaigning.”

When confronted with the criticism, Brock points to American Bridge’s track record with helping Priorities USA and Obama allies define and defeat Mitt Romney during the 2012 race, or the group’s work on the Todd Akin “legitimate rape” controversy.

“The organizations I created were supposed to be there for the long haul and outlast a Hillary Clinton presidency,” Brock said. “So it’s not about me and it’s not about her… And I believe American Bridge accomplished its mission 100 percent in defining Trump negatively… [It’s part of the reason] why Trump took office as the most unpopular president in the history of polling… [But] nobody’s perfect, and that includes us.”

When asked why he thinks so many alumni of Team Hillary are furious with him, he responded that he’s “been one of the few Democrats out there who had regular interaction with the Clinton campaign who’s been willing to be critical of it on the record, and I’m sure that has made some people unhappy.”

But outside allies aren’t the only ones voicing concerns over Brock’s approach; the rough sentiments are shared among some of the people who have worked directly for Brock and his liberal network.

“He has a tendency to overstate his level of impact and importance,” a former operative of one of Brock’s organizations said. “There is a sense [in Brock’s own groups] that he cares less about progressive policies and moving the ball forward, and is actually more focused on stroking his ego.”

Another Democratic operative close to the Brock empire told The Daily Beast that the experience working with him only deepened suspicions that Brock cared more about himself than the liberal base or the party at large.

“Somewhere along the way, it became instead of putting the mission of American Bridge [or Media Matters] first, it became about putting him first, growing his power in the party—his popularity,” the operative said. “There’s no question that his groups were the least effective of 2016. If anything they did harm.”

The staffer concluded: “I have never worked somewhere with so much unlimited resources [where] I don’t think they’re used efficiently.”

Several members of the Brock empire painfully recall what they viewed as self-aggrandizing, exuberant episodes involving their boss. One such memory took place at a Christmas party in 2015 at the Comet Ping Pong pizza joint (of “#Pizzagate” infamy) in Washington, D.C. There, staffers recall, Brock at one point climbed atop the restaurant’s bar to deliver a fired-up speech. As Brock approached the finale of his remarks, the DJ started blasting Queen’s stadium-rock anthem, “We Are The Champions.”

As Brock’s acolytes in the crowd looked on and cheered wildly, various staffers began glancing at one another, raising eyebrows and chuckling about yet another moment that read to them as their fearless leader caring only about perceived power and popularity.

Still, Brock is not without his allies on the left, or center-left. James Carville, a longtime friend and ally of the Clintons who has worked for Brock’s operation, is skeptical that anti-Brock operatives know any better.

“Are they calling for purges?” Carville rhetorically asked The Daily Beast. “David has a really good relationship with a lot of donors and people who can help the party. If I were them, I would be thinking of ways I could work with David Brock, as opposed to having a tribunal determining the extent of party purity. I don’t think we need to walk around with ideological chastity belts.”

In the end, Brock says that he and his toughest critics are going to just have to agree to disagree on this one.

“There an old culture around the Democratic Party where you stick your head out and lead, and people try to cut it off,” Brock said. “I came into organizing in progressive politics 14 years ago with a lot of baggage from the right wing and, understandably, there was skepticism. I overcame that over time with hard work and performing well, and earning people’s trust. There’s no other way to do it…I’m going to continue earning the trust as I go.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 201701; brock; davidbrock; democrat; democratic; democraticparty; democrats; donaldtrump; enoughalready; first100days; mediamatters; trump; womensmarch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
During Trump’s inauguration weekend, Brock held a conference for activists, politicians, and donors at a resort in South Florida to pitch his grand vision. All but one of the candidates currently running to chair the Democratic National Committee attended, conspicuously missing the Women’s March on Washington on Saturday.
1 posted on 01/26/2017 6:45:00 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I thought Media Matters was funded by Soros. I must be confusing it with something else.


2 posted on 01/26/2017 6:48:20 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The blind leading the blind.


3 posted on 01/26/2017 6:49:31 AM PST by Awgie (Truth is always stranger than fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“I think that should be everybody’s goal on the left, to destroy Donald Trump, not to destroy each other.”

Please don’t anyone tell these morons that by making it their goal to destroy Donald Trump they assure their own destruction. Same as with the mainstream media.

At the end of the day Clinton lost the race largely because her campaign believed its own bullshit. Brock was the supreme B.S. artist. I sure hope they keep him around.


4 posted on 01/26/2017 6:53:32 AM PST by Junk Silver (I have four words for Bill and Hillary Clinton to ponder: "Attorney General Jeff Sessions".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

It is and was funded by Soros.

Brock has found additional sources of funding for the propaganda machine. Soros is not the only source.


5 posted on 01/26/2017 6:55:04 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
“He does not have the kind of understanding of what kind of coalition you have to bring together to win national races—that’s his fundamental problem.”

If he were black, and female, and lesbian...she would be an unquestionable Democrat saint. :)

6 posted on 01/26/2017 6:55:57 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

Well, two out of three ain’t bad...................


7 posted on 01/26/2017 6:57:13 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

You are correct...................


8 posted on 01/26/2017 6:58:26 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
"Brock’s groups include Media Matters, a liberal news media watchdog and American Bridge, the party’s primary opposition research organization..."

Brock also had Sidney Blumenthal on these payrolls.....a scuzzball who seemed to be on everybody's payroll.

BACKSTORY--Longtime Clinton family crony and Secy Hill's top aide (tax-paid US govt employee, Cheryl Mills' side business, "BlackIvy Investments," is developing) a privately-financed dry port that will be located 56 km outside of the Port of Dar es Salaam, and will use shuttle trains to take transit and upcountry cargo to and from the Port. So how did BlackIvy, a brand new firm with no discernible track record of building ports, manage to become an overnight player in the East African energy market?

It turns out Mills had some help from a company called Symbion Power, which was created to profit off rebuilding efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan after the US invasions. Symbion Power happens to be a very good friend of Hillary Clinton.

Hillary's pal, Sid Blumenthal was the conniving Clintons' bagman---a $325,000 employee of the Clinton Foundation, he had numerous paid side interests----promoting any number of foreign deals and schemes in which he had a financial interest.....many of which were predicated on the toppling of Libya's Khadaffi.

Blumenthal was ambidextrous---chronically emailing Hillary Libya foreign policy messages w/ one hand....his other hand firmly in the State Dept cookie jar.

In one confidential e-mail to Clinton, Blumenthal was clearly colluding w/ onetime Amb Joe Wilson (Valerie Plame's hubby) to help himself to the tax dollars in the State Dept cookie jar.

GAME ON Amb Wilson pumped himself up as a 'director' of Symbion Power---an outfit seeking millions of dollars in contracts from an obscure government agency chaired by Hillary....the Millennium Challenge Corp. (MCC)

In September 2010, Hillary's MCC awarded Symbion $47 million tax dollars for (cough) 'power projects in Tanzania.'

EVER WONDER how much of the $47 million tax dollars got to Tanzania....after the players divvied it up among Blumenthal, Wilson, the Clintons, Obama?

NOTE Millenium is also the source of the 100 million tax dollars Michele gave to Morocco "to teach Muslim girls" to be held by, and "administered" by the Obama Foundation.

===========================================

FREEPER FEATURE--DO THIS NOW: demand the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) books be opened. We demand to know the financial details and the scope and dimension of individuals connected to these outrageous State Dept giveaways.........govt parasites profiting at taxayers' expense.

9 posted on 01/26/2017 7:00:05 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I am surprised a Soros funded group is being so rejected


10 posted on 01/26/2017 7:00:10 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This is about pizza.


11 posted on 01/26/2017 7:00:37 AM PST by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Soros' name may not be on the ownership papers but he funds them by the millions (tons of articles found in searches).

Comet Ping Pong Pizza Alefantis, Barney Frank, David Brock wearing a simply fabulous dog collar.

12 posted on 01/26/2017 7:00:44 AM PST by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

They aren’t, by the ones who will control the Party. All but one showed up for the confab. That tells you something.................


13 posted on 01/26/2017 7:03:05 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Brock cared more about himself than the liberal base or the party at large.

Where's the country in this, not that GOPe cares a fig for that either?

14 posted on 01/26/2017 7:03:58 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
The Bank Secrecy Act should be mobilized----to follow the paper trail and determine how money from David Brock Entities (D/B/E) changes hands; to determine the scope and dimension of collusion in sub rosa deals, who might be personally profiting and if financing terrorism is being facilitated for the express purpose of overthrowing the US government.

<><> L/E needs to examine D/B/E bank accounts.

<><> Joint bank accounts might be used to facilitate the transfer funds from one account to another, and/or wire-transferred offshore;

<><> To cover their tracks, fake invoices might be created to show that money deposited into D/B/E accounts was being used for legitimate purposes.

<><> Financial schemes scheme might be advanced by issuing phony statements of payments from financial sources that actually covered the transfer of funds for insiders' personal use and/or for financing migrants from terrorist countries....for the express purpose of overthrowing the US government..

===============================================

NOTE WELL Under the Bank Secrecy Act, banks are required to establish, implement and maintain programs designed to detect and report suspicious activity indicative of money laundering and other financial crimes and financing terrorism. “The Bank Secrecy Act was enacted to protect the public from harm by identifying and detecting money laundering from criminal enterprises, terrorism, tax evasion or other unlawful activities,” the special agent in charge for Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation, explained.

Shady banking transactions could be prosecuted under the (1) Bank Secrecy ACT, (2) RICO, and, (3) the Hobbs Act.

=============================================

<><> L/E should get ahold of: (1) copies of D/B/E checks, (2) wire transfers, (3) account statements, (4) invoices, (5) bills, (6) delivery tickets, (7) correspondence including snail mail, e-mail, mobile devices, cell phones, (8) contracts, (9) loan agreements, (10) other account books or official records.

L/E should also explore (a) monies D/B/E paid to brokers, sub- brokers, (b) family members, (c) mortgage brokers, (d) financial managers, and, (e) real estate agents, brokers, and developers.

<><> L/E should scrutinize Brock's bank accounts for suspicious activites: (A) large deposits, (B) funds transferred from one account into another, (C) frequent requests for withdrawals.

<><> Bank records might also show diversions to secret LLC accounts, to money launder and to operate personal ventures;

Tax fraud may also be a factor, facilitated by withdrawals, gift cards purchases, credit card purchases and intra-bank transfers from legal bank accounts into personal accounts, or redistribution schemes.

<><> A huge tipoff is whether bank withdrawals support luxurious lifestyles including payments for real estate, investment and stock holdings, jewelry, luxury vehicles, resort travel....... and gifts from luxury outlets.

15 posted on 01/26/2017 7:05:17 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Liz

The IRS should audit these traitorous leeches........................


16 posted on 01/26/2017 7:05:34 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Junk Silver

As long as the $$$$$$ flows, they will......................


17 posted on 01/26/2017 7:06:43 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fedora
Brock and his group are nothing less than a devious under-handed cabal seeking to overthrow the US govt.

Scratch off the cheap "tolerant and compassionate" veneer of these liberal types and you get raging haters, salivating to overthrow the US govt, to install a govt of their choosing.

These deluded demented inbreds act like the safety and security of Americans is inconsequential. That issue didn’t make the A-list of “Things To Do To Make Us look Good In Our Own Eyes.” They lost and they can't accept it.

There is something so intrinsically troubling about the self-absorbed mindset of these people. Their concerns are limited by “I, my, me, mine.” They can’t see past their own prejudices, needs and desires.

A truly fruity bunch. They are a ruinous gaggle of overpaid, entitled, smarmy, elitist, know-it-alls. Their entire world revolves around themselves.

They do nothing but cash multiple US govt checks and count the number of brown people in govt.

================================================

ACTION NOW Contact your Representative
Capitol Switchboard 1-866 -220-0044

Contact President-Elect Trump's web site. www.greatagain.gov.

Trump and Sessions MUST close down every single one of these tax-free organizations and foundations raising money to overthrow the US govt.

FIRST---Instruct the IRS to pull their tax-free status.

THEN---Prosecute them all for aiding and abetting the overthrow of the US govt.

18 posted on 01/26/2017 7:08:02 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

NAMBLA will be deeply saddened if the Brockster loses his grip on DC power money


19 posted on 01/26/2017 7:09:39 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Can you say kickback?

DAVID BROCK Money Laundering Scheme Exposed:
14 Pro-Clinton Super PACs & Non-Profits Implicated
zerohedge.com ^ | Sep 20, 2016 / FR Posted by Helicondelta

David Brock has 7 non-profits, 3 Super PACs, one 527-committee, one LLC, one joint fundraising committee, and one unregistered solicitor crammed into his office in Washington DC.

Uncovered records expose a constant flow of money between these organizations.

The Bonner Group, his professional solicitor, works off a commission. Every time money gets passed around, Bonner receives a 12.5% cut.

Follow the money: Say, for example, you donate $1,062,857 to Media Matters for America. This is how David Brock would have used your charitable donation in 2014:

1- Media Matters would receive your $1,062,857 donation The Bonner Group would earn a $132,857 commission Media Matters would retain $930,000

2- Next, Media Matters would give what’s left of your entire donation, $930,000, to the Franklin Education Forum The Bonner Group would ‘earn’ a $116,250 commission The Franklin Education Forum would retain $813,750

3- The Franklin Education Forum would then forward the remaining $813,750 to The Franklin Forum The Bonner Group would ‘earn’ a $101,718 commission The Franklin Forum would retain $712,031

In the end, Brock’s solicitor would have pocketed $350,825, almost a third of your initial donation! That’s a far cry from the advertised 12.5% commission....more at zerohedge.com


20 posted on 01/26/2017 7:10:52 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson