Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ryan Invites Trump to Address Joint Session of Congress
ABC News ^ | January 24, 2017

Posted on 01/24/2017 1:24:20 PM PST by SMGFan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Lurkinanloomin

Exactly. Google,’ paul ryan, a better way’. These are the policies he wants to push. Kinda like the globalists ‘third way’. He’s a snake.


21 posted on 01/24/2017 1:43:31 PM PST by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that rmemoveth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Thanks, DoughtyOne. I’m one of those who “put aside their initial thought on him.” Glad I did.

Now, if some like the previous poster would give up their insistence that Paul Ryan is the Devil Incarnate, President Trump and Congress just might pull off the Great American Restoration!


22 posted on 01/24/2017 1:44:02 PM PST by Walrus (2 Thessalonians 3, 10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

A Presidential address before a joint session of Congress on Mardi Gras?


23 posted on 01/24/2017 1:44:42 PM PST by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
How many Dems will stay away?

My first thought as well.

24 posted on 01/24/2017 1:45:17 PM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

will Trump have new material with legislative specifics?

The dems don’t need to ever show up for two years. the dems in congress have no value


25 posted on 01/24/2017 1:45:22 PM PST by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Macroagression melts snowflakes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

I was approached by someone on the forum and asked what I thought of Trump in the April to May 2015 time-frame.

They tried to refer me to his platform ideas, and I tried to gracefully decline. I told them I couldn’t see myself supporting him.

(I’ve searched over and over to find this exchange, and can’t find it. I’d like to look back on it now and give that person props for trying to get me to take a look early on.)

At any rate, on June 13th, 2015, he announced. I listened. I liked what I was hearing. My early intent was to simply get folks to listen to him, then make up their own minds. I didn’t want folks digging in before they had seen his policy goals. I thought they were pretty good.

I held off endorsing him for several months. I wanted to give it time to see if he would waver. He didn’t. I bought in. I backed him and voiced support for Cruz as the V.P., follow-on president, and a later SCOTUS pick.

By October I had had enough of Cruz. I disavowed him for anything.

I’ve been in the Trump camp since August of 2015.

If he had changed or waffled, I would have had to change my mind. He didn’t.

He’s still on target now, and I salute him for it.


26 posted on 01/24/2017 1:45:43 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Obama, Clinton, McStain, and Graham, with people like this, who needs enemies?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

I agree. It is a trap.


27 posted on 01/24/2017 1:46:27 PM PST by LouisianaJoanof Arc (Proud horrible deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Hopefully ALL OF THEM!.....................


28 posted on 01/24/2017 1:46:58 PM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

My first thought as well.

And my next thought was “how many Republicans stayed away from Obama’s first address to a joint session of congress”?


29 posted on 01/24/2017 1:47:13 PM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

There is nothing in the Constitution about a SPEECH, and nothing about its frequency.

This would be a STFU speech. A “juvenile spectacle,” as Scalia called it. Trump should decline, and make a huge deal about the money he’s saving.


30 posted on 01/24/2017 1:48:20 PM PST by Arthur McGowan (https://youtu.be/IYUYya6bPGw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nclaurel; Lurkinanloomin

I am fairly confident Paul Ryan will get his comeuppance in a way that destroys his career.


31 posted on 01/24/2017 1:49:41 PM PST by Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

There is nothing in the Constitution about a speech, and there is nothing about its frequency.


32 posted on 01/24/2017 1:50:05 PM PST by Arthur McGowan (https://youtu.be/IYUYya6bPGw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Walrus

I’m a guy that doesn’t trust Paul Ryan any farther than I can drop kick him.

I’m not going to trash him every day, but that’s my take on him.

If he pans out to be good, good for him. If he gives any inclination of trying to block Trump, or ‘defang’ Trump’s policy, I’m going to be furious with him.

One old trick I’m trying to watch very closely, is the offering up of a bill that sounds like Trump’s plans, but lacks certain tenets and goals.

If he tries one of those end runs, I’ll also be furious.

McConnell
Ryan
McCain
Graham
Rubio

The five men that can do more harm to Trump’s realization of his goals, than anyone else.


33 posted on 01/24/2017 1:50:41 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Obama, Clinton, McStain, and Graham, with people like this, who needs enemies?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Flavious_Maximus
What is this “our” agenda he is talking about? When did he become the president?

Ha sit dawned on anyone that he may have now bought in to the Trump agenda? One can hope so.

34 posted on 01/24/2017 1:51:03 PM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Ha sit dawned ... Has it dawned


35 posted on 01/24/2017 1:52:26 PM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Nailed It !

36 posted on 01/24/2017 1:52:28 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Dahoser
"Looking forward to it and the mad rush among the RATS to be the first one to scream, “You lie!”

No, I expect them to do something even more embarrassing, Like a massive walkout as he speaks ( after shaking his hand down the isle to get the press in their district ), wearing some clothing or pin with "meaning" or that pacifier thing they did on the house floor with coloring books.

Their symbolism has no bounds however, if P-DJT continues to rack up wins w/ Manufacturing, Unions, and Small business and the "numbers" start looking better in less than a month, they will look like absolute dolts if they become a barrier to success and they will play a price politically.

37 posted on 01/24/2017 1:54:19 PM PST by taildragger (Do you hear the people singing? The Song of Angry Men!....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Gotta admit, didn't care for the guy initially.

Now...damn, just damn. I'm about as giddy as a school boy on his first date. Trump's kickin @$$.

38 posted on 01/24/2017 1:54:29 PM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I wish it would catch on...somebody on this board one typed:

“Its a Tarp!”


39 posted on 01/24/2017 1:54:56 PM PST by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

Instead President Trump should do a “fireside chat” from the Oval Office direct to the People.


40 posted on 01/24/2017 1:56:45 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson