Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Reportedly Deploys ICBMs Near Russia’s Border
RT ^ | 01/24/17

Posted on 01/24/2017 8:45:18 AM PST by Enlightened1

Beijing has deployed advanced Dongfeng-41 ICBMs in Heilongjiang Province, which borders Russia, according to reports based on images, possibly leaked to coincide with Donald Trump’s inauguration as US president. “Pictures of China's Dongfeng-41 ballistic missile were exposed on Chinese mainland websites,” the Global Times said citing reports in “some Hong Kong and Taiwan media.” Russian news agencies identified one of them as the Apple Daily, a Hong Kong-based tabloid-style resource.

“It was revealed that the pictures were taken in Heilongjiang Province. Military analysts believe that this is perhaps the second Dongfeng-41 strategic missile brigade and it should be deployed in northeastern China,” the report in the Chinese daily adds. The Global Times works under the auspices of the People’s Daily, the official newspaper of the Chinese Communist Party, though the former tends to be more controversial.

The DF-41 is a three-stage solid-propellant missile, which is estimated to have a range of up to 15,000km and be capable of delivering up to 10 MIRVed nuclear warheads. China is yet to show the ICBM to the general public during a military parade or any similar event. Most information of the advanced weapon remains highly classified.

There is speculation that China plans to deploy at least three brigades of DF-41s throughout the country. The image leak may have been timed with Trump’s inauguration, with the new president expected to take a confrontational stance towards China, according to the Global Times’ report.

Before taking office he angered Beijing by threatening to end the ‘One China policy’, which acknowledges continental China as the only Chinese nation and rejects Taiwan’s claim to be one. He also said he would pressure Beijing on economic issues like its monetary policy and trade barriers.

(Excerpt) Read more at rt.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; Russia
KEYWORDS: border; china; deploy; icmb

1 posted on 01/24/2017 8:45:18 AM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Why would an ICBM have to be deployed to a border? It’s an ICBM.


2 posted on 01/24/2017 8:49:49 AM PST by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

One advantage the province in NE China, a.k.a Manchuria, is mountainous. From what I read the Chinese like the build silos into mountains.


3 posted on 01/24/2017 8:52:32 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Just add this ICBM in road mobile. Sound my mountain silo theory is shot although the ChiComms might build mountain side bases to house the mobile units.


4 posted on 01/24/2017 8:53:45 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Send the Seventh Fleet to cruise through the South China Sea... slowly.


5 posted on 01/24/2017 8:53:47 AM PST by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

It’ll be very interesting to see what Putin does about this, if anything...


6 posted on 01/24/2017 8:58:51 AM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

A 9,300 mile range strategic weapon doesn’t need to be near a border in the range of SOF units.


7 posted on 01/24/2017 9:02:31 AM PST by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

It’s a target.
Move the targets away from population centers as far as possible..................


8 posted on 01/24/2017 9:03:17 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

It is estimated that China has only 300 nuke warheads.

Both the US and Russia have 1500 in proven intercontinental delivery systems.


9 posted on 01/24/2017 9:06:19 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

To a border? No one does that.


10 posted on 01/24/2017 9:08:02 AM PST by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

It’s out in the middle of nowhere.....................


11 posted on 01/24/2017 9:10:03 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
I get it. There are a lot of middle of no-where's in China. Those D-41's fit nicely on mobile launchers, eliminating the need to put them close to an isolated international border- within reach of anyone's SOF units.

So the Chinks are comfortable enough with the Ruskies, of which they still have contested borders, to put strategic weapons near? That's what I was getting at.

12 posted on 01/24/2017 9:24:42 AM PST by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

That’s what I was thinking.


13 posted on 01/24/2017 9:32:43 AM PST by WKUHilltopper (WKU 2016 Boca Raton Bowl Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

The Russians probably don’t care. They can wipe out any of the Chinese missiles fairly quickly in the even it becomes necessary................


14 posted on 01/24/2017 9:37:00 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

Actually, it is a very astute move on the Chinese part.

If the US tries to take these ICBMs out, it will not be immediately apparent if its an attack on Russian or Chinese territory. So taking them out might bring about retaliation against the US from BOTH Russia and China.

The only problem is that Putin may not like that game.


15 posted on 01/24/2017 10:00:02 AM PST by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

China could not get a missile off the ground without blowing up.But thanks to bill Clinton taking their bribes he was able to get Loral to solve there issues for them.

Now we not only have Russian nukes to worry about we have Chinese as well.


16 posted on 01/24/2017 10:19:46 AM PST by puppypusher ( The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Look at Heilongjiang province, everywhere else in China is closer to everything in Russia that you’d need to hit, rather than that place they moved the ICBMs to. It only makes sense for targeting CONUS.
Its not an anti Russian move.


17 posted on 01/24/2017 10:23:38 AM PST by DesertRhino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson