Weird that some anti-globalization orgs back that, when it is also backed by Soros orgs which push globalization. How strange is that? Plus all the CAIR and moslem backing.
That is one of the strange paradoxes of the Marxist movement. Marx’s goal was to redistribute the wealth of capitalist corporations to the proletariat, but since he believed in Hegelian dialectic, he saw capitalist monopoly as a step towards a communist revolution. By the logic of dialectic, owners of international corporations can still see themselves as revolutionaries as long as they’re using their wealth to fund charitable causes—or, taking a more cycnical approach, they can see revolutionaries as tools to help them establish a monopoly by crushing competitors. And so we find entities like the UN and George Soros, who are at the center of the globalist movement, backing anti-globalist anarchist groups. As for the Muslim backing, I think wealthy Muslims see anti-globalists and other revolutionary groups as pawns to play against the EU and America, so they’re taking over the role of sponsorship of the left previously filled by state sponsors like the Soviet Union and Cuba. Which isn’t to say there aren’t any state sponsors left—China is the biggest one that is operating largely under the radar right now—just that some of these networks are transnational in scope, in the spirit of Marx’s First International.