Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Friday's action keeps in place pollution reduction targets for the years 2022-2025. That means the fleet of new cars will have to average 51.4 miles per gallon by 2025, up more than 18 mpg from the 33.2 mpg requirement in 2015, the most recent year available."

These are ridiculously high mileage requirements, which would result in many Americans being forced to drive dinky, unsafe vehicles.

IMO, a more legitimate and beneficial goal for the Federal Government would be to come up with a national energy policy that focuses on exploration and production of energy resources, so as to provide a reliable and affordable energy products for the American people. That way, people would be able to afford to purchase the fuel needed for quality and safe to drive vehicles.

I am going to contact both the Trump transition suggestion site and my congress critters, as I am incensed that Obama would try to do this to American drivers and auto makers in the last few days of his term. Here is the Trump suggestion web site link:

https://apply.ptt.gov/yourstory/

1 posted on 01/14/2017 7:33:06 AM PST by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
To: mtrott

The EPA does not make laws.


2 posted on 01/14/2017 7:34:21 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (STOP THE TAPE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott

The real question is: who’s whispering in this worthless piece of crap’s jug ears instructing him to do this?


4 posted on 01/14/2017 7:37:13 AM PST by Noumenon (Proud Irredeemable Deplorable, heavily armed Infidel. Islam delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott

Screw Obama and his attempts to play to the radical liberal base and control our lives. Another target for Trump to just trash the EPA and clean out the Obama stooges.


5 posted on 01/14/2017 7:37:44 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott
a decision that will be difficult for the incoming Trump administration to undo.

Oh really!


6 posted on 01/14/2017 7:39:16 AM PST by darkwing104 (Forgive but don't forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott

I would be curious to hear what Scott Pruitt has to say about this.


7 posted on 01/14/2017 7:39:30 AM PST by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott

“Friday’s action keeps in place pollution reduction targets for the years 2022-2025”

Next Friday’s action will make it all meaningless and a lesson for future generations not to repeat such stupid actions.


8 posted on 01/14/2017 7:39:32 AM PST by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott

As far as I’m concerned the move from leaded to unleaded ruined gas mileage and increased the price dramatically - ethanol just compounds the problem.


10 posted on 01/14/2017 7:40:07 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott

This is an easy one. Trump will crush the EPA like a bug. No bureaucracy has this kind of power over a President.


12 posted on 01/14/2017 7:43:14 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott

The impending REINS Act will allow Congress to overturn this rule. Obama thinks he’s being clever.

Any rule that imposes $100 million worth of costs upon the economy must receive congressional approval before it can take effect.

Good night midnight regulations.


13 posted on 01/14/2017 7:43:24 AM PST by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott

Obama is like Saddam Hussein’s troops did as they were pushed out of Kuwait in Gulf War I....setting fire to the oil wells in his own petty way.


14 posted on 01/14/2017 7:44:57 AM PST by CASchack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott

It’s an impossible goal. But since the democrats hate the freedom of mobility that cars represent, they want the goal to be impossible. Their desire is to rid the world of the automobile.


15 posted on 01/14/2017 7:45:08 AM PST by meyer (The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott

I certainly wish we could get rid of ethanol - what a horrible idea. Drops mileage by at least 3.5% as ethanol has about 1/3 less energy than gasoline and is 10% of the fuel - but in the real world it is more likely to be 6-10% reduction.


19 posted on 01/14/2017 7:49:06 AM PST by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott

I surely would enjoy seeing Trump reverse this at the Detroit Auto Show, right before he places his order for the first Dodge Demon.


22 posted on 01/14/2017 7:51:44 AM PST by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott

The only four wheel vehicles currently getting 51.4 mpg or better in the U.S. market are electric cars and Toyota’s hydrogen powered Mirai. Hybrids don’t cut it. In order to meet the EPA targets the majority of new cars will have to be electric or hydrogen powered (which actually have electric motors).


23 posted on 01/14/2017 7:51:49 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott

Ostupid is daring Trump to undo this so the Dems can use it as a club against him. It is the same with all the other EO and other actions he has taken and will continue to take until he is gone.

The Dems are acting like spoiled brats who are determined to piss in the pool before they are forced too get out.


34 posted on 01/14/2017 8:00:18 AM PST by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott

Trump needs to simply point out that the decision was made in 2 WEEKS after comments were submitted, whereas the normal time is 12 to 16 months.

Based on that, just call it ILLEGAL and require the EPA to revert back to its old standards.


35 posted on 01/14/2017 8:01:30 AM PST by BobL (In Honor of the NeverTrumpers, I declare myself as FR's first 'Imitation NeverTrumper')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott

This what happens when stupid people elect stupid politicians who encourage stupid bureaucrats to interfere with free enterprise.


36 posted on 01/14/2017 8:02:05 AM PST by fortes fortuna juvat (God, Guns, and Trump will save the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott

“...a decision that will be difficult for the incoming Trump administration to undo. “

I keep hearing things like this but Congress can legislate away!


40 posted on 01/14/2017 8:06:47 AM PST by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott
The Environmental Protection Agency moved Friday to cement strict fuel economy requirements that force the auto industry to make new cars and trucks significantly more efficient, a decision that will be difficult for the incoming Trump administration to undo.


41 posted on 01/14/2017 8:06:50 AM PST by Lazamataz (TRUMP LIED TO ME!!!! ....He said I'd get sick of winning.... AND I'M NOT SICK OF WINNING YET!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtrott

If there’s one thing we’ve learned from Obama and the Democrats, it is that you can do whatever you want to do.


43 posted on 01/14/2017 8:11:09 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson