Nobody is obliged to rewrite laws consistent with an aberrant Supreme Court decision. What is that supposed to mean?
You still are being deliberately opaque. And you continue, AFAICS, to disregard the freedoms recognized by the First Amendment that Obergefell v. Hodges have attacked.
“Nobody is obliged to rewrite laws consistent with an aberrant Supreme Court decision. What is that supposed to mean?”
I didn’t say they were and your question is unclear.
“You still are being deliberately opaque.”
False, at least in regard to “deliberately”.
“And you continue, AFAICS...”
Either you’re looking in the wrong direction or you can’t see very far.
“...to disregard the freedoms recognized by the First Amendment that Obergefell v. Hodges have attacked.”
That’s not what I’ve tried to discuss in this thread. That doesn’t mean I have disregard.
I think we’re done here. Take the last word if you must, and have a nice day(no sarcasm intended).