Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Candor7

Dear Cando,

re; “Congressional procedure is so like that.The Founders knew what they were doing.”

It is NOT ‘Congressional procedure’, it is U.S.C. Title Code.

Since the Electoral College is a Constitutional Article, the ‘procedures’ are called out in the U.S.C. title Code, as LAW.

Therefore, each of the “objections” raised, were in violation of Code, when NOT having been signed by BOTH a sitting Representative AND a sitting Senator, and were ILLEGAL by U.S. Law. They were criminal actions.


12 posted on 01/07/2017 5:36:36 AM PST by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Terry L Smith

They were not criminal actions but they were out of order.


16 posted on 01/07/2017 5:54:31 AM PST by frogjerk (We are conservatives. Not libertarians, not "fiscal conservatives", not moderates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Terry L Smith

Thank you for the code edification. I am all for arresting the a$$hats and putting them in the cooler.


19 posted on 01/07/2017 6:37:10 AM PST by Candor7 ( Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Terry L Smith

Are you sure?
I thought the House members were entitled to raise the objections. When they raise the objection, it is an invitation to the sitting Senators to support the objection.
They did not.

The VP had to slap them down if not supported by a Senator.


35 posted on 01/07/2017 7:17:12 PM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson