Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stumping Earnest: Say, why didn’t Obama eject China diplomats over OPM hack?
Hot Air ^ | 6 Jan 2017 | ED MORRISSEY

Posted on 01/06/2017 2:57:33 PM PST by mandaladon

Call this the Question of the Week. ABC’s Jon Karl asked White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest on Tuesday about why Barack Obama expelled 35 Russian diplomats for hacking the DNC but didn’t expel any Chinese diplomats for hacking an actual government agency and stealing the highly confidential records of 21 million government employees. Earnest … really didn’t have much of an answer. Via RealClearPolitics and our pal Matt Vespa:

JON KARL, ABC: So when the Chinese hacked OPM in 2015, 21+ million current and former government employees and contractors had their personal data stolen by the Chinese. Why did the White House do nothing publicly in reaction to that hack? Which in some ways, was even more widespread than what we saw here from the Russians?

JOSH EARNEST: These are two cyber incidents that are malicious in nature but materially different.

KARL: 20 million people had their personal data taken… fingerprints, social security numbers, background checks. This was a far-reaching act–

EARNEST: I’m not downplaying the significance of it, I’m just saying that it is different than seeking to interfere int he conduct of a U.S. national election. I can’t speak to the steps that have been taken by the United States in response to that Chinese malicious cyber activity–

KARL: But nothing was announced. There was not a single step announced by the White House.

EARNEST: It is true that there was no public announcement about our response, but I can’t speak to what response may have been initiated in private.

KARL: But no diplomats expelled, no compounds shut down, no sanctions imposed, correct? You don’t do that stuff secretly.

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: china; dnc; hacking; obama; russia; trump
And yet, the Obama administration did nothing to publicly rebuke China, except scold them in a speech. How well did that work out? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Hypocrisy at its best!
1 posted on 01/06/2017 2:57:33 PM PST by mandaladon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

The easy answer is that it didn’t reveal dirt on any Democrats. Dissing Democrats is the unforgivable sin.


2 posted on 01/06/2017 3:03:22 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

What’s more important, the DNC or America?


3 posted on 01/06/2017 3:04:59 PM PST by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Lou Dobbs basically asked the same question of Ralph Peters when Peters was going cuckoo yesterday about “all the damage (supposedly)” “those darn Russians” did to America’s 2016 election.


4 posted on 01/06/2017 3:05:33 PM PST by SaveFerris (Hebrews 13:2 Do not forget to entertain strangers, for ... some have unwittingly entertained angels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogie

bttt


5 posted on 01/06/2017 3:05:34 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
This came up a number of times in the Senate hearing yesterday. The intelligence people said that "people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones", implying that despite the size of the OPM hack, they somehow still regard it as normal espionage, and we are doing similar things to China and others.

Personally, I feel like the OPM attack was largely our own fault. If we make it easy for our databases to be hacked, and we don't even pay attention while it is happening, we can't expect other countries to just do us a favor and keep their hands off. Obviously quite a few heads need to roll in our own government and we need an intensive program to ensure that nothing like this ever happens again.

6 posted on 01/06/2017 3:17:30 PM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

True. Another answer is that China is still Communist Party controlled.


7 posted on 01/06/2017 3:18:35 PM PST by Kudsman (Trump or bust 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Maybe because our first gay, muslim president is their little bitch boy? Maybe? Perhaps?


8 posted on 01/06/2017 3:22:10 PM PST by DonPaulJonesII (The only thing than a democrat is a lousy, dishonest, disloyal scumbag republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Terrorist: “It is my INTENTION to kill for Allah. My MOTIVATION is I am a soldier for ISIS.

US Intelligence Agencies: “It is very hard to establish MOTIVATION OR INTENTION. We cannot attribute MOTIVATION or INTENTION of any perps of the recent incidents.”

US Intelligence Report: “While we cannot release any specifics we are 100% certain that we have determined the MOTIVATION and INTENTION of Putin and the entire leadership of Russia.”

Is it just me or is this smack of the politicization of intelligence?

Remember, Trump like Gulliani DOES not question the loyal intel agents in the field but only agencies who are lead by the likes of Jeh Johnson, John Brenner, and James Clapper.


9 posted on 01/06/2017 3:30:48 PM PST by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Go Egypt on 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

You have to wonder if Josh Earnest would answer “Earnestly” about which hand He wipes His @$$ with.


10 posted on 01/06/2017 3:39:13 PM PST by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

HAHAHAHAHA!!! Good for Karl!!


11 posted on 01/06/2017 3:51:49 PM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
"I’m just saying that it is different than seeking to interfere in the conduct of a U.S. national election."

But the Russians didn't "interfere in the conduct of the US election." Assuming they were behind the DNC/Podesta hacks, they revealed information to the public that the US media would suppress, thereby giving the public more information on which to base their choice. Not that there is any evidence that the leaks changed a substantial number of votes, or even any votes.
12 posted on 01/06/2017 4:01:10 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Obama sure didn’t rebuke the Chinese. Yet the Chinese nevertheless disrespected him. While providing a red-carpet welcome to world leaders, the Chinese refused to provide rolling stairs to Obama and he had to exit through the service door.


13 posted on 01/06/2017 4:01:57 PM PST by Jane Austen (Neo-cons are liberal Democrats who love illegal aliens and war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris
"Lou Dobbs basically asked the same question of Ralph Peters when Peters was going cuckoo yesterday about “all the damage (supposedly)” “those darn Russians” did to America’s 2016 election."

Peters seems to have done a 180 lately. Last week he attributed Merkel's immigration policy to her "strongly held Christian beliefs."
14 posted on 01/06/2017 4:03:32 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Interesting.

Well, we would all like to help the less fortunate.

But, being blind to islamic terrorists..........etc.


15 posted on 01/06/2017 4:16:03 PM PST by SaveFerris (Hebrews 13:2 Do not forget to entertain strangers, for ... some have unwittingly entertained angels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Silly. He’s on the Chinese payroll, but not the Russian payroll. Remember he’s the Manchurian candidate, not the Siberian candidate.


16 posted on 01/06/2017 5:03:45 PM PST by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

“Peters seems to have done a 180 lately”

Peter’s endorsed Hillary for President, enough said.


17 posted on 01/07/2017 4:15:02 AM PST by DAC21 (in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson