I would trust Edward Snowden and his motives much more readily than ANYTHING Edward J. Epstein has to say. His book INQUEST came out in ‘78, and is still regarded as a partial Gospel by people too lazy to have delved very deeply in the assassination of JFK. He is one of many disinformation specialists and the fact that his book came out 15 years after the event, suggests that it was intended to quell the rising tide of AUTHENTIC and INDEPENDENT research as to who in fact was behind the assassination. There have been many like Epstein, both before and after him.All you will ever need to know about the assassination can be found in Vincent Salandria’s COPA speech from the 90s, called False Mystery. It’s online. Epstein is and was a CIA asset. It is fitting also that he is associated with M.I.T. , which was put on the map by another “Gatekeeper” and fake “Radical” and fearless “Independent Thinker” , Noam Chomsky.
A hit piece perfectly timed to cast doubt on both Snowden and Wikileaks. Snowden’s twitter over the last several days has been linking to the articles that analyze and undermine the JAR report. Since the JAR makes the opposite conclusion of Assange’s own statements about Russian involvement, a narrative is being amped-up that Snowden and Wikileaks have been in bed with the Russians all this time. In other words, we should stop listening to the guys and just trust the govt., mmm kay?
Although if true, it would certainly change my opinion of Snowden.