Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Montreal Bans New Restaurants to Protect Incumbents [existing restaurants]
Reason ^ | 24 December 2016 | Baylen Linnekin

Posted on 12/29/2016 9:27:31 AM PST by Lorianne

'Montreal has one of the highest restaurant per-capita ratios in North America and the amount of places to eat is worrying local politicians.' ___ lawmakers in Montreal have moved to crack down on new restaurants, in an odious attempt to protect existing ones.

"Montreal has one of the highest restaurant per-capita ratios in North America and the amount of places to eat is worrying local politicians," reads a Canadian Press piece from earlier this week.

If that sounds awful and weird, that's because it is. Studies of the best places to eat often conclude that the more restaurants a city has per-capita, the better its restaurant scene. It's no surprise that the more choices a consumer has, the better off that consumer is.

Montreal does have an impressive number of restaurants. Data shows Montreal trails only New York City in terms of restaurants per capita in North America. As in New York City, that competition is great for Montreal's consumers. But it puts pressure on incumbent restaurateurs. So lawmakers have decided to side with the latter.

The worry expressed by lawmakers has turned into a ban on new restaurants from opening within 25 meters of an existing one along the city's Rue Notre Dame, the street the now-shuttered Sans Menu once called home. Notably, the action comes as "a number of commercial and retail properties remain empty" in this same part of Montreal.

(Excerpt) Read more at reason.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada
KEYWORDS: toomanyrestaurants
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 12/29/2016 9:27:31 AM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Socialists hate competition and free market economies.

Why not just have one restaurant, and let the state own it.


2 posted on 12/29/2016 9:30:04 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Everything will be Taco Bell.

But they won’t serve tacos.


3 posted on 12/29/2016 9:31:42 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

[eyeroll] What if Montreal-ers actually want to eat out that much? What if one of the new ones that’s being locked out might actually be better than one of the existing ones? What if we let people vote with their Canuck dollars, or Quebecois francs, or whatever the hell Montrealers have in their wallets, and let the cream of the restaurant business rise to the top?


4 posted on 12/29/2016 9:32:06 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

So they are banning new restaurants in Montreal, because they have enough, per the city officials???

I know I’m prone to “capitalist” thinking, but, isn’t this an area where the market will decide how many restaurants are enough??? And that those restaurants who don’t attract enough business will go under??

Do we really want to see government artificially limit the number of any type of business??

What if someone wants to open a new restaurant, perhaps offering a different type of food than existing restaurants have? Wouldn’t we want the market to decide if this new type of food will find enough people to patronize such a restaurant and keep them in business?

This sounds like bad news to me.


5 posted on 12/29/2016 9:32:40 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Everything will be Taco Bell.

But they won’t serve tacos.

"Fill out these forms and you'll get your taco within 6 to 8 weeks."

6 posted on 12/29/2016 9:33:54 AM PST by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I, for one, am happy that the government of Montreal is stepping in to protect the city’s residents from the twin perils of good food and economic development.


7 posted on 12/29/2016 9:34:03 AM PST by drop 50 and fire for effect ("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Every attempt to regulate the market leads to higher cost, worse service, and bad products.


8 posted on 12/29/2016 9:34:28 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN (US out of the UN, UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Why even one? Let the Army distribute food, as in Venezuela.

Just give Pretty Boy .10 more years and we’ll need a northern wall too.


9 posted on 12/29/2016 9:35:20 AM PST by RossA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

This will work exactly like Rent Control...................


10 posted on 12/29/2016 9:36:28 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drop 50 and fire for effect
I, for one, am happy that the government of Montreal is stepping in to protect the city’s residents from the twin perils of good food and economic development.

Well played, sir.

11 posted on 12/29/2016 9:41:28 AM PST by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Hahaha...made me think of “Demolition Man”...:)


12 posted on 12/29/2016 9:43:08 AM PST by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

You beat me on the eye-roll.

I swear, liberals are using “Atlas Shrugged” as an instructional manual (they being on the side of the looters) instead of a cautionary tale.


13 posted on 12/29/2016 9:44:21 AM PST by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

The Socialist state dictating their edicts... History has proven time and time again that Socialism doesn’t work. Free enterprise does.


14 posted on 12/29/2016 9:44:33 AM PST by jerod (Socialism=Governance by Government - The National Socialist German Workers' Party is a good example.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Yeah, we need a directive 10-289 requiring all Montreal-ers to eat at exactly the same restaurants they always have, with exactly the same frequency. Otherwise somebody could go out of business!


15 posted on 12/29/2016 9:47:57 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

So even if you suck you get to stay open!


16 posted on 12/29/2016 10:01:56 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie

The Barack Hussein Ebola doctrine of restaurant management. (After all they didn’t build that!)


17 posted on 12/29/2016 10:10:57 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RossA

Fidel’s son learned well from his father’s work in Cuba


18 posted on 12/29/2016 10:17:12 AM PST by Mr. K ( Trump kicked her ass 2-to-1 if you remove all the voter fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Another misleading headline:
... a ban on new restaurants from opening within 25 meters of an existing one along the city's Rue Notre Dame...
19 posted on 12/29/2016 10:20:25 AM PST by numberonepal (First they came for Sarah, then they came for Herman, and now they've come for Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

U.S. cities usually do the same via liquor licenses.


20 posted on 12/29/2016 10:22:18 AM PST by Yo-Yo ( Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson