Elections have consequences. What is “ climate change” specifically?
Our courts are congested as a result of all the regulations from the progressive left. This is a great beginning. Gut all the ‘grievance’ garbage and the lawsuits filed for ‘hurt feelings’.
Time to Grow Up girls and girlee men.
The west coast states will surely bankrupt themselves trying to fight climate change without federal money.
California will be another Greece in 3 years and another Venezuela in 5 years.
.
Is Northern California still pushing for a split? A threeway split may actually make more sense.
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Corrupt, RINO-controlled Congress could have put a stop to lawless Obama’s climate agenda at any time, Obama’s climate agenda based on stolen state powers. So the real problem is Congress imo, not Obama.
The states have never expressly constitutionally delegated to the feds the specific power to regulate, tax and spend in the name of climate issues.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
There !
In stark contrast to institutionally indoctrinated Republican attorneys being paid for the last eight years to battle unconstitutional climate change policy, I killed it in minutes with the Constitution.
Trump has his work cut out for him with respect to draining the swamp.
Good. Tear it all down.
This would eliminate the mythical 'carbon tax' from being imposed by liberal leaning socialist regimes. It will also save consumers throughout the world from needlessly being taxed trillions of dollars in disposable income. Income they could spend on manufactured goods and services. Income that can grow the real economy, rather propping up pet projects favoured by the liberal elites.
We have *never* seen a real debate on global warming and climate change.
In their usual style, The Left made speaking against climate change politically incorrect. They viciously attacked — including ruining careers — anyone who didn’t go along with the program. On the other side they made sure tremendous amounts of funding went into only studies that supported their claims.
The entire debate — or total lack of — and the tactics that have been used have been completely dishonest.
The climate change issue smells to high heaven. It is a one-sided political initiative. It is phony and rotten to the core.
At the very least, we need to ensure that the debate is honest and that funding is distributed evenly to both sides.
.
Between the climate change savings and the sanctuary city savings, Trump may be starting off with a surplus.
New laws at the expense of repealing 2 others will be an asset as Trump pushes his agenda through.
HOORAY attorneys general
DEFUND totalitarian memes foreign and domestic.
live - free - republic
It’s war with the Warmers! Let slip the dogs...
“We’ve got the scientists, we’ve got the universities, we’ve got the national labs, and we have the political clout for the battle. And we will persevere; have no doubt about that.”
And we’ve got the drills, the rigs, the common sense of the American people, the political power, the guns, mace, fire hoses, and handcuffs.
Excellent!