I note that you're being rather adamant about a possibility that is rather unlikely given the circumstance, so it appears as if you've made conclusions of your own.
Incorrect. In my original post I stated that the article is ambiguous, and does not support any conclusion regarding culpability of the shooter for the incident. That is my basis for debate - that we DO NOT KNOW.
What you or I THINK is immaterial to the truth.
Merry Christmas, FRiend.