Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ninth Circuit Overturns ruling on Second Amendment Waiting Periods
ammoland ^ | 15 December, 2016 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 12/23/2016 4:15:26 AM PST by marktwain

Edited on 12/23/2016 7:16:23 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

The panel reversed the district court

(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; ninthcircuit; secondamendment; waitingperiod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
It is clear that as far as the Second Amendment is concerned, in the Ninth Circuit, there is no serious right that "shall not be infringed".
1 posted on 12/23/2016 4:15:26 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Anything that is counter to what America is and what she stands for is “reasonable” to the Ninth Circuit.


2 posted on 12/23/2016 4:18:29 AM PST by Paulie (America without Christ is like a Chemistry book without the periodic table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

THe second ammendment does not say “shal not be infringed (except for ‘reasonable safety precautions’)”

This should go right to Trump’s new supreme court.

Whatever they did to make gay marriage “law of the land” by court decision they should immediately do for national concealed carry.


3 posted on 12/23/2016 4:20:05 AM PST by Mr. K ( Trump kicked her ass 2-to-1 if you remove all the voter fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Look forward to Trump getting opportunity to appoint new members to the 9th circuit.


4 posted on 12/23/2016 4:20:26 AM PST by Reno89519 (Drain the Swamp: Replace Ryan & McConnell; Primary Lyn' Ted and others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“A 10-day cooling-off period would serve to discourage such conduct and would impose no serious burden on the core Second Amendment right of defense of the home,” she said.

...

People who do such things plan it for weeks or months. There is no discouragement.

The waiting period is nothing but a burden on the law abiding.


5 posted on 12/23/2016 4:22:28 AM PST by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

I hope that president Trump announces he will ask Congress to impeach the ninth district Court. We need a shot fired across the bow of the judicial creating


6 posted on 12/23/2016 4:24:58 AM PST by datricker (President Elect Trump MAGA baby MAGA yeah! Free Julian!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

“The waiting period is nothing but a burden on the law abiding.”

For the gun confiscators, it is a way to get the camel’s nose inside the tent.


7 posted on 12/23/2016 4:29:58 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The ninth circus strikes again. I wish there were enough 2A Dems in the senate to impeach and remove the clowns.


8 posted on 12/23/2016 4:30:00 AM PST by VRW Conspirator (Enforce the Law. Build the Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I would post what I think about the grotesque idiocy of 9th Circuit Judge Mary Schroeder, but the 10-day First Amendment cooling-off period would make my comments moot.


9 posted on 12/23/2016 4:30:48 AM PST by Zeppo ("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

So shouldn’t this also mean that “the people” also need a “waiting period” before protesting and shooting off their mouth about something or burning the flag? That’s only “common sense” and should require a “cooling off” period.


10 posted on 12/23/2016 4:44:47 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (As long as tyranny exists, the Constitution and Bill of Right will never be "outdated" or "obsolete")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeppo

Well said sir.


11 posted on 12/23/2016 4:48:38 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

If it’s irrational, count on fubar.gov to latch onto it forthwith.


12 posted on 12/23/2016 4:48:40 AM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

9th Circuit Judge Mary Schroeder is a Carter appointee. It’s amazing the damage a president can do decades after leaving office, and instructive for the incoming Trump team on the importance of draining the swamp and making solid appointments.


13 posted on 12/23/2016 4:53:42 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Trump needs to pay particularly close attention to this Court when vacancies occur.

L


14 posted on 12/23/2016 4:57:58 AM PST by Lurker (America burned the witch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The 9fh circus is the most overturned court in the country.


15 posted on 12/23/2016 5:02:28 AM PST by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

A 10-day “cooling off period” is a huge leap in assumption there is some insane white guy out who can’t wait to shoot his wife or neighbor. All is based on fake news sourced imagery substantiation and not facts of history.


16 posted on 12/23/2016 5:04:01 AM PST by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All

They should have found a test case where someone bought a new gun with identical qualities as a gun they already owned. Let the 9th Circuit twist itself into knots imagining a scenario where two identical guns in the hands of one owner are riskier than one.


17 posted on 12/23/2016 5:10:34 AM PST by FirstFlaBn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

....Applying an exhaustive historical analysis, we concluded that the carrying of concealed weapons outside the home had never been acceptable and was therefore beyond the scope of the Second Amendment’s protections...

Yes, Galifornia, please secede.


18 posted on 12/23/2016 5:23:51 AM PST by Sasparilla (I 'm Not Tired Of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRW Conspirator
"The ninth circuit strikes again"


19 posted on 12/23/2016 5:27:43 AM PST by Eddie01 (Comment Removed by Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

That’s right - the pen is mightier than the sword. We should definitely have longer waiting periods for free speech than to buy a gun - that would only be reasonable.


20 posted on 12/23/2016 5:43:18 AM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson