Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will a Close Election Put Electoral College on the Chopping Block?
The New American ^ | 29 October 2012 | Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.

Posted on 12/19/2016 7:34:27 AM PST by VitacoreVision

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: VitacoreVision

So ... instead of the majorities of each state deciding who becomes POTUS, let’s allow 3 million illegal alien Mexicans in California to decide.

Yep, that’s the ticket ...


21 posted on 12/19/2016 8:49:28 AM PST by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a' white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN

The left knows there power is in the big cities, they can control the message and the votes. Not so much in fly over country. So they want to change the rules so only they will ever win.


Of course.... there is not a single law or rule that the left has changed in elections that does not directly benefit them. They will do anything, including flooding our nation with millions of migrants, to gain power.

Using the popular vote erases the electoral power of rural states. To use one of their favorite words - it DISENFRANCHISES small states.


22 posted on 12/19/2016 8:50:47 AM PST by volunbeer (Clinton Cash = Proof of Corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

You can’t have a national popular vote take all system with 50 different sets of rules for presidential elections. The verification of eligible voters for most states is also in question.


23 posted on 12/19/2016 8:55:01 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Hillary 2016 - We haven't hit bottom yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ueriah

I realized reading your response that my post wasn’t clear. I meant given the choice between the two extremes— popular vote and one state one vote. I also believe the way things are is a good compromise.


24 posted on 12/19/2016 9:49:47 AM PST by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LambSlave

Each state one vote? Sounds good but the Electoral College system was designed to be more in line with the system of representatives being apportioned by population. The Senate, having two senators from each state, is more like your suggestion. Can’t you hear the cries (and pissing and moaning) from Mexifornia when their state gets one vote and Montana gets the same?


25 posted on 12/19/2016 11:48:41 AM PST by BatGuano (You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

“The electoral college cannot be put on any chopping block short of a constitutional amendment. The Constitution requires an electoral system for electing the President and there is only ONE way to legitimately and validly change the Constitution: NOT from the SCOTUS bench, NOT by calling it “a living document” - ONLY by a constitutional amendment.”

You forgot “I have a pen and a phone!”


26 posted on 12/19/2016 11:51:39 AM PST by BatGuano (You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson