Again, the finger-pointing. As the CEO of her campaign, why didn’t Clinton adjust course? Was she of a temperament of which no one could challenge her, no one could give her bad news? Was she so arrogant that she couldn’t even consider the possibility that Trump could challenge her? If so, those are horrible qualities in an executive. Never to blame, never assumes responsibility, narcissistic enough to believe your way is the only way—sheesh. She’d be Obama, Part II.
And Trump proved he is the antithesis of that
MAGA
I think you have caught the essence of what happened.
Isn’t Shrillery the one who said that TRUMP would be the perfect candidate for her to go up against?