Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

From Russia with Money
Government Accountability Institute ^ | 08/01/2016

Posted on 12/18/2016 11:24:18 AM PST by thinden

A Putin connected Russian government fund transferred $35 million to a small company with Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta on its executive board , which included senior Russian officials.

John Podesta failed to reveal, as required by law on his federal financial disclosures, his membership on the board of this offshore company.

(Excerpt) Read more at g-a-i.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hillary; podesta; putin; skolkvovo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
leading into tomorrow's electoral college vote, the "Russian Hack" has dominated the MSM news cycle for going on two weeks now.

This piece from Government Accountability Institute (dated 8/01/2016 & I searched FR archives before posting) does an excellent job (imo) of putting all the pieces together on who is really "in bed with Putin" and from reading this 56 page document, it's easy to see it is not Trump.

Dots are connected that tie Putin to Hillary to Podesta to WJC to Tenneo and more.

obvious quid pro quo examples cite money transfers from Russian interests to Podesta, Clinton Foundation, and WJC during Hillary's term as SOS.

Questionabale "dual use" assests were transferred to the Russians.

After reading through this article, the current "Russians are coming" scare, seems more like a diversionary technique by Dem Fake News crew to take the focus off their own questionable activities with Putin & the Russian oligarchy.

I'll try to add some additional excerpts for comments later.

1 posted on 12/18/2016 11:24:18 AM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thinden

Lock ‘em all up!


2 posted on 12/18/2016 11:27:05 AM PST by Don Corleone (Oil the gun, eat the cannolis, take it to the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz; Wallaby

heads up.

this is from august, but seems like a very detailed well documented (12 pages of footnotes) piece that needs to be dusted off before tomorrow’s electoral college vote to help understand what was really going on in US/Russian “innovation” partnerships.


3 posted on 12/18/2016 11:29:21 AM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thinden

So. Follow the Putin-Russian $$$$$$$$$$$$$ and you end up
at Podesta/Hillary. - Bill must have meant it when he
rejoiced that he’d never have to pay another “light” bill.


4 posted on 12/18/2016 11:39:36 AM PST by Twinkie (John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
"...Russian government fund transferred $35 million to a small company with Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta on its executive board ....John Podesta failed to reveal, as required by law on his federal financial disclosures..."

Lock up tricky deceiving whore Hillary and Podesta asap!

5 posted on 12/18/2016 11:45:46 AM PST by Mr Apple ( Let's play.........Hide the Muslim: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59J0i3LNoY8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thinden
Talk about hypocrisy...

There is a related FR post that went up just 6 minutes after this post.

Podesta was on Meet The Press this morning.

He refused to acknowledge that the Trump election was “free and free.”

Podesta claimed the Russians “intervened” to help Trump!

6 posted on 12/18/2016 11:46:22 AM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twinkie
Those on the Russian side of the Skolkovo research project have also donated to the Clinton Foundation. The man heading up the Skolkovo Foundation in Russia is a controversial figure named Viktor Vekselberg.

Described as “one oligarch who isn’t afraid to get down and dirty” (Fortune magazine) and “the oligarch’s oligarch” (Esquire), Vekselberg made his billions in the oil and metals sectors.

Vekselberg is a Putin confidant and a Clinton Foundation donor via his company, Renova Group.

The Clintons were clearly cultivating their relationship with Vekselberg during Hillary’s tenure as Secretary of State. On June 4, 2012, the foreign policy director at the Clinton Foundation, Amitabh Desai, reached out to Cheryl Mills, Jake Sullivan, and Michael Fuchs at the State Department via email. The subject line was “Russia/Viktor Vekselberg?” Vekselberg and his company the Renova Group had contributed between $10,000 and $25,000 to the Clinton Foundation.

7 posted on 12/18/2016 12:06:41 PM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Twinkie
another excerpt from the piece:

Another Russian figure deeply involved with Skolkovo who had financial ties to the Clintons is Andrey Vavilov. The former Russian government official is the Chairman of SuperOx, which is part of the Nuclear Cluster at Skolkovo.

The Nuclear Cluster at Skolkovo is committed to enhancing the nuclear capabilities of the Russian state. A major listed beneficiary of this research is Rosatom, the Russian State Nuclear Agency, which manages the country’s nuclear arsenal.

Vavilov has donated between $10,000 and $25,000 to the Clinton Foundation.

Rosatom, through its subsidiary ARMZ, purchased a Canadian uranium company called Uranium One in 2010 which held assets in the United States and therefore required State Department approval. Nine Uranium One shareholders donated more than $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.

Some of those donations, including those by Uranium One Chairman Ian Telfer, had not been disclosed by the Clinton Foundation.

8 posted on 12/18/2016 12:10:53 PM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thinden

It’s probably a mistake to assume all Russian businessmen are aligned with Putin.


9 posted on 12/18/2016 12:16:57 PM PST by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
here's an excerpt from this article that states the Russians intervened to help Podesta:

In June and July 2011, during the time period that he was advising Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, John Podesta joined the board of three related entities: Joule Unlimited, a small Massachusetts based energy company; its holding company, Joule Global Holdings, N.V., which was based in the Netherlands; and Joule Global Stichting, which appears to be the ultimate controlling entity.

According to corporate records, Podesta served on the “executive board.” Joule was a new company, founded in 2007 and claimed to pioneer a technology they called “Liquid Fuel from the Sun,” a technology based on harnessing solar energy. Podesta consulted for a foundation run by one of the investors in Joule Energy, Hans - Jorg Wyss a major Clinton Foundation donor.

95 The Wyss Charitable Foundation has given between $1 million to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation.

Podesta was paid $87,000 by the Wyss Foundation in 2013, according to federal tax records.

Podesta’s compensation by Joule cannot be fully determined. In his 2014 federal government disclosure filing, Podesta lists that he divested stock options from Joule. However, the disclosure does not cover the years 2011 - 2012.

10 posted on 12/18/2016 12:32:57 PM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: independentmind

yes, I see you have come up with a very independentmided assessment of russian businessmen.

and while not all russian businessmen are aligned with Putin, it’s very obvious from reading this article that several Russian Oligarchs ARE aligned with Clintons & Podesta.

while there is NOTHING in this piece, or anywhere else that I have found (other than what is churned out by the propaganda apparatchiks at MSM Fake News outlets)that aligns Trump with Putin.


11 posted on 12/18/2016 12:40:38 PM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thinden

MORE FAKE NEWS CRAP I investigate it hahahaah


12 posted on 12/18/2016 12:58:23 PM PST by hawg-farmer - FR..October 1998 (------->VMFA 235 '69-'72 KMCAS <------- "Death Angels")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thinden

I’m not pro Hillary or anti Trump.

I just have a hard time believing that the Clintons were knowingly working with members of the Putin camp.

And it has long been apparent that Putin has low regard for both Obama and H. Clinton.

What the underlying intentions of the Russian businessmen ( oligarchs?) were with respect to these transactions is not clear.


13 posted on 12/18/2016 12:59:22 PM PST by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: independentmind

A major technology transfer component of the Russian reset overseen by Hillary Clinton substantially enhanced the Russian military’s technological capabilities, according to both the FBI and the U.S. Army.
• Russian government officials and American corporations participated in the technology transfer project overseen by Hillary Clinton’s State Department that funnelled tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation.
• A Putin connected Russian government fund transferred $35 million to a small company with Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta on its executive board, which included senior Russian officials.
• John Podesta failed to reveal, as required by law on his federal financial disclosures, his membership on the board of this offshore company.
• Podesta also headed up a think tank which wrote favorably about the Russian reset while apparently receiving millions from Kremlin linked Russian oligarchs via an offshore LLC.


14 posted on 12/18/2016 1:02:04 PM PST by stocksthatgoup (Where's Hillary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: thinden

Bttt


15 posted on 12/18/2016 1:03:13 PM PST by stocksthatgoup (Where's Hillary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twinkie

It is absolutely, positively clear that Clinton campaign manager Podesta did some very lucrative deals with Russia. The same is true for Hillary and the Clinton Foundation and it’s many entities. These deals may not have been in the best interests of the United States. The Fact that Podesta and Clinton did not disclose these deals as required by law indicates they have something to hide. Perhaps there are more undisclosed deals.
It is a fact that all nations including America (Angela Merkel’s accounts were hacked by the U.S.) hack other governments. Information is valuable.
Do I think Russia wanted Hillary to be President? Yes I do because she is greedy and money hungry and thus easy to manipulate.


16 posted on 12/18/2016 1:23:08 PM PST by Yolanda (You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: independentmind

Well. Putin is not alone in holding the clintons in low regard (if indeed that is the case).

You seem to have interest, or maybe even questions about the clintons working with the putin camp or intentions of various russian oligarchy, and it is people exactly like you that motivated me to post this article for discusion.

I’m sure if you linked into the piece you probably had feelings similar to mine when l ran accross the article: very long & very deep reading.

It is a complex accounting documenting several different accounts of questionable dealings between obammy, hillary, podesta, putin & several russian players l had never heard about before l read the whole article.

It’s a fast moving world we live in & lll be very surprised if you or anyone else has, or will take the time to grind through this whole article, & l don’t think you’ll ever find a quicker, more convenient, better documented source to answer the questions you pose.

If you choose to invest your time taking an objective look at this piece, please get back to me with your impressions.


17 posted on 12/18/2016 1:58:43 PM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: thinden

Once upon a time, I looked quite deeply into some articles posted on FR.

I simply don’t have time these days to do so.

My comment was intended as criticism directed toward you.

My impression though is that there is extremely bad blood between Hillary Clinton and Putin. Most of it is personal, but I think Hillary is firmly in the neutralize/break-up Russia camp. (Mackinder’s Heartland Theory)

So if that is the case why the business deals? It could just be greed. Or it could be an attempt to play various Russian factions against each other


18 posted on 12/18/2016 2:08:55 PM PST by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: thinden

I meant to was Not intended...


19 posted on 12/18/2016 2:16:48 PM PST by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

ping


20 posted on 12/18/2016 2:17:42 PM PST by Liz (W W W W W W w w w w w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson