Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rogue One: Are Chirrut and Baze Star Wars's first same-sex couple? (Well THAT didn't take long)
Yahoo! Movies UK ^ | December 15, 2016 | Tom Butler

Posted on 12/16/2016 9:58:22 PM PST by Ciaphas Cain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: Secret Agent Man

Absolutely true. They become video game characters, and I can’t relate to video game characters like I can to real people, so I lose the ability to care if they live or die or get hurt. It prevents me from immersing myself in the movie.


61 posted on 12/17/2016 8:24:33 AM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (The GOP will see the light, because Trump will make them feel the heat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain
Rogue One: Are Chirrut and Baze Star Wars's first same-sex couple? (Well THAT didn't take long)

If it has anything to do with Disney, Faggotry will be a prominent part of it.

62 posted on 12/17/2016 8:24:48 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

How long until Disney has the first big screen full penetration, with closeups, gay sex scene to celebrate diversity?


63 posted on 12/17/2016 10:06:53 AM PST by Organic Panic (Rich White Man Evicts Poor Black Family From Public Housing - MSNBCPBSCNNNYTABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic

I doubt Disney’s going to pull THAT off. For starters, they’d have to consider the fact that ultimately, families are paying to see their movies. While they can get away with claiming that, technically, Gay Days is not officially affiliated with Disney, the same can’t be said about their big screen features which are STILL ultimately geared toward families. Heck, when that pastor accused Disney of promoting homosexuality in Frozen, they nearly got into DEEP trouble as a result. Even they wouldn’t be that stupid.


64 posted on 12/17/2016 10:53:18 AM PST by otness_e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: NELSON111
They want to “gay” everything...even when it’s not.

I had this discussion with a friend a while back, that one of the consequences of the gaying up of the West is that deep friendships between men are either discouraged or mocked. Any time two guys in a movie or a TV show have a close friendship, it is referred to as a "bromance" which by its very name implies sexuality. I don't know if this effort is deliberate or just one of the many negative consequences of feminism and cultural marxism in general, but either way it deprives men and society of one of the most crucial elements of life. Tight bonds among men are what make the world go 'round. They are what makes any organization or society function and remain intact (which is probably why it is being derided). These days especially, women can walk out on a whim and take all of your wealth and family, but a good friend is forever.

It is almost as if the natural tendency for men to form these bonds is being deliberately perverted. Young men who crave such bonds are told now that they must be gay, and so what would have been a constructive bond becomes destructive, and other men might shy away from developing such bonds to avoid the stigma of "bromance". It truly is an insidious trend, and should be resisted at all costs. You'll notice that men are not allowed to gather these days. Men's clubs are sued to allow women, any that resist are called "sexist, misogynist," etc. If the group persists, like the Boy Scouts, an effort is then made to pervert the organization through homosexuality. It is precisely to keep men from forming social bonds and thereby becoming stronger, more able to resist the programming and demoralization that the Left spews out.

When the time comes truly to fight these people, we'll need trust and cooperation between men to do it. That is what the Left is afraid of.
65 posted on 12/17/2016 5:18:07 PM PST by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RC one

I’ll buy a ticket to another movie then watch the new star wars movie, just to check it out.


66 posted on 12/18/2016 5:17:53 AM PST by stockpirate (OBAMA MUST BE ON THE PAYROLL OF THE CLINTON FOUNDATION.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

I’m going to go see it again. I am very careful about the movies I see. My money won’t go to libs like damon and aflek. I saw nothing in this movie that made me think SJW though. It was just good.


67 posted on 12/18/2016 9:11:23 AM PST by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson