Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Better than the current 'lapse' in providing ample equipment. Just need to ensure that when completed they are capable of performing the assigned tasks.
1 posted on 12/16/2016 7:23:57 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rktman

F’n yeah! tired of the Chinese and Russian military build up.


2 posted on 12/16/2016 7:25:46 AM PST by 12th_Monkey (I'm DEPLORABLE and I'm OK with that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Reagan worked towards a 600 ship navy.Less military, more debt. Something’s wrong.


3 posted on 12/16/2016 7:28:49 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
That means, a lots more Sailors to.
5 posted on 12/16/2016 7:30:06 AM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else need s said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
Build the Montana Class BBs.

Because we can.

7 posted on 12/16/2016 7:32:34 AM PST by Jim Noble (Die Gedanken sind Frei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
outlining a massive increase in the size of its high-end large surface combatant and attack submarine fleets

"High-end large surface combatant" . . . you mean, battleships? (Oh well, one can dream . . .)

10 posted on 12/16/2016 7:36:11 AM PST by bus man (Loose Lips Sink Ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

> ...this is the level that balances an acceptable level of warfighting risk to our equipment and personnel...

“Warfighting”?
Could we use terms any more liberal.
“Combat” was the accepted term for centuries, let’s keep it that way.


11 posted on 12/16/2016 7:36:25 AM PST by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
and NO Littoral Combat, (Torpedo Target) Ships
13 posted on 12/16/2016 7:38:58 AM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else need s said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

GOOD ....jobs, defense etcetera ....... whats not to like .


15 posted on 12/16/2016 7:42:25 AM PST by Squantos (Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

How about a cross between a HUGE gunned battleship that can withstand atomic weapons and a drone carrier with swarms of attack and defense drones......yeah man....


17 posted on 12/16/2016 7:47:31 AM PST by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Kill the LCS program and transfer existing hulls to the USCG.


19 posted on 12/16/2016 7:49:53 AM PST by paddles ("The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
40 of those ships are the failed littoral ship concept. "In response to the mounting storm of criticism, on Dec. 16, 2015, Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter announced that the original buy of 55 LCSs, already cut to 52, would be cut to 32 ships plus an additional eight “frigate” versions of the original LCS. The Navy prefers to go even further by cutting the LCS buy to 28 ships plus 12 “frigate” LCSs  -  and is requesting approval of a 12 ship block buy to lock in the program’s production commitment with a concomitant large increase in concurrency." See post: The U.S. Navy’s Redesigned Future Ship Still Won’t Fight http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3505267/posts
23 posted on 12/16/2016 8:06:04 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Build DE subs instead of the extremely expensive complex Nuke types.
The new DE subs are quiet, fast, can stay submerged for extended periods.


26 posted on 12/16/2016 8:11:24 AM PST by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

This Army Officer, Retired, says Go For It!!


31 posted on 12/16/2016 8:56:57 AM PST by Uncle Sam 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Gasp - the Navy knows it need more equipment to do its job. Gonna be some heavy spending happening to try to rebuild our Military after Obama gutted it while still increasing the debt astronomically despite the “peace savings”.....


34 posted on 12/16/2016 9:11:07 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
Ulithi anchorage, 1945:

At one point prior to the Okinawa invasion there were over 700 ships anchored there.

Murderer's Row:


44 posted on 12/16/2016 10:04:18 AM PST by PLMerite (Lord, let me die fighting lions. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson