sorry didnt see that.
i think it has been brought up, the other side have always argued only people who work for the church are covered. courts have agreed.
“i think it has been brought up, the other side have always argued only people who work for the church are covered. courts have agreed.”
==
My thinking is that since the law deals with concrete terms, how does it define “church”? That is, what is the source “dictionary”, legally. Is it the same as the one used by people who say they are the church? The legal devil (or angel) might be in the semantic details.