The NYT takes the cake for fake news
Posted on 12/13/2016 1:25:26 PM PST by onyx
At this point there is no reason to believe anyone.
This is was not only FAKE but a non-story.
Virtually no voters read those emails (the Podesta, campaign emails) and there is zero way to prove that the emails changed even one vote. Even if they did, that is the prerogative of each individual voter.
What do they want now? We have to fill out an affidavit before voting listing everything we read and listened to before voting?
In the end this is a coordinated attack on CITIZENS of this country, no matter who they voted for. We are the targets, the ordinary citizens and voters. They despise us and want us gone.
I’m sure it will be the leading story across the nation tonight,,......sNOT!
I don’t think Bill was relishing a return to the White House as First Dude, but I don’t think he’d absolutely torpedo Hillary since he’d be torpedoing himself to an extent. Too big of an ego to take that sort of hit to his “legacy” such as it is. He’s corrupt and a perv but he’s no dummy, and unlike his wife he can see how things look to the rest of the world.
This bullshittery of people dangling shiny objects in front of us has to stop. Give a name, provide proof, or shut the hell up.
And why isn’t Weiner in jail or apparently in any trouble for sexting a NC minor?
Maybe he still has “insurance” that we don’t know about.
“They want us gone”
Hillary sure let us know what she thinks about us. She would put us in camps if she got half a chance.
The NYT takes the cake for fake news
She’s not the only one. Plenty of people out there who would more than gladly put people in camps ... if we were lucky ... more likely up against a wall.
Who to believe?
Anonymous intelligence sources who ONLY leaked to the Washington Post? Or, the people who published the leaks???
The Democrats are so incredibly incompetent that having, lost monumentally, all they can do is scream “Russia did it.”
Let me make a wild guess: the leaker is also WaPo’s source fingering the Russians to deflect turning the light on him?
as Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, MD, PhD, a distinguished intelligence professional, informed us near the time of the election. This was a counter-coup by intelligence agents who are sick and tired of the lawlessness of Obama and Hillary and who turned to Wikileaks as whistleblowers.
They call us stupid without a college education. What they really mean is we are threat because we are not college INDOCTRINATED.
LOLOLOLOL.
Oldie but goodie!
I still laugh.
This info furthers my belief that the info probably came from an inside source at the NSA. The current administration and Hillary are about to go into major panic mode because this destroys their narrrative. You can bet O and pals will be looking at every NSA employee and contractor with suspicion. The trio needs to make sure they aren’t in the same place at the same time from here on out. Also additional security on the leaker after getting an in-depth statement and securing it off-line and online.
All of them.
I seriously doubt the Saudis poured as much money into Hillary's campaign as they did without something more than Hillary's word that she'd deliver and wasn't planning to stab them in the back. Knowing what she was telling her closest people would be exactly the kind of thing they'd want.
As careless as Huma and her Wiener both were, there are a lot of ways someone could have gotten a duplicate of whatever she took.
I also suspect the NYPD has their own copy of everything Assange got and more. If so, odds are that they let Trump know what they have in general terms if not in detail.
All of them.
Okay, we've got our list of suspects narrowed down..................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.