Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Draining the Swamp: Ted Cruz and Ron DeSantis to Propose Constitutional Amendment on Term Limits
Breitbart ^ | December 9, 2016 | Ken Kew

Posted on 12/10/2016 6:57:32 AM PST by COUNTrecount

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Old Retired Army Guy
They are asking the Congress to term limit themselves???? Good luck with that !

Enough torches, clubs and pitchforks in the streets might help change their thinking!

41 posted on 12/10/2016 8:20:59 AM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Billyv
When they can no longer enrich themselves at the taxpayers ( citizens ) expense they will not stay in DC long.

The cream will rise to the top; only those who are truly willing to SERVE will stick around.

42 posted on 12/10/2016 8:23:03 AM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

I’ve noticed that Trump hasn’t spoken about term limits for quite some time, he probably knows that there will be little support for it in congress, the mother of all swamps needing draining.


43 posted on 12/10/2016 8:26:41 AM PST by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: euram

For all the sense term limits makes, without other Congressional reforms, the pool of Congressional staffers would gain even more mostly anonymous power. As it is, they are almost permanent, passed from one Congressman to another and even between parties. They write or co-write with lobbyists most legislation.


44 posted on 12/10/2016 8:34:42 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

I agree, maybe give them a 401k for the years they served but that’s it!


45 posted on 12/10/2016 8:36:07 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Repealing the 17th Amendment would be a far better solution.

I think Trump is someone who could convince the country to do it, if his heart were into it.
46 posted on 12/10/2016 7:56:55 PM PST by TTFX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ducks1944

Your idea will help, but voter ID laws in any form does not address the real voter fraud and that is what takes place in the polls. Those working the polls can vote as much as they want, not enforce ID laws etc. Only way to stop voter fraud for a generation is to move all states to award electoral votes based on congressional district. It deflates the popular vote argument. Eliminates the big city effects on states, i.e. Philly in PA, Charlotte in NC, Chicago in ILL, etc. The other alternative is integrated voting machines throughout each state with a voter card, such as an atm card. It can only be used once during the election day or period. Of course that would have to be a national policy and the feds can’t dictate how the states award electors to the federal offices. Of course we don’t want the feds taking more control of the states. This could have been done after 2010, when Blue wall states of MI, WI, OH, PA all had R trifectas. Zero would not have won re-election if they had changed to awarding electoral votes by congressional district. We had the support here in PA, but the state GOP chair shot it down. The dude has been chair for 20 years and has never won PA for the republican, but shot it down because he felt it would reduce PA’s influence, IOW his clout if changed. Of course T winning PA had nothing to do with that bozo. Voter ID laws do have an effect by causing fraudsters to do less, but they are worthless if those working the polls do not enforce the photo requirement. You can’t vote in PA if your name is not registered in the book, so only by those polls, i.e. the 59 or so in Philly with 100%+ turnout, where the workers do not enforce the law or actually perpetrate the crime does this fraud take place.


47 posted on 12/10/2016 8:52:22 PM PST by pghbjugop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

yes!


48 posted on 12/11/2016 2:43:46 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

How about a Constitutional Amendment that prevents persons who are not natural born citizens from becoming President?

Oh, wait.

Never mind.


49 posted on 12/11/2016 2:47:03 AM PST by Radix (Natural Born Citizens have Citizen parents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

They don’t have to limit themselves. They can grandfather in the existing congress and put the limits on future politicians.


50 posted on 12/11/2016 7:26:13 AM PST by New Jersey Realist (America is the land of the free BECAUSE of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson