I did not see the other two parts.
May have been sloppy in my look, but I wanted to see them.
I’m trying to figure out how all those women could have been totally wrong, or gaming the system and not getting caught.
This police investigator reminds me of the McMartin case in Los Angeles. They ran a day care center and all sorts of accusations were made. In the end it was pretty well admitted it was all a massive hoax, a mishandling of child witnesses, and leading them by improper interviews.
If you have a belief going in, you can come up with a reasoned enough presentation to validate it, and if people fall for it, the defendant can be in serious trouble.
Once again though, IF this guy WAS guilty, nobody wants him to pay more than I do. The over the 200 year mark sentence does seem rather excessive considering what murder sentences are these days.
One of the women described a short black man. One put an attack in a park but GPS from the car refutes that. The DNA guy put a whole different spin on the case. There were several accusers that they never included in the case because they were obviously just making up stuff hoping to cash in. The amount of DNA was microscopic, lot of flags from my perspective.