Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarMema

From other posts here, it seems the USCA upheld Goldsmith unless and until the state court determined the recount did not meet the state’s laws requirements for a recount, at which time the state would go back to the USDC to withdraw the order which, from what I’m reading, related only to timing, i.e., start now, not in two days.

The federal courts didn’t become involved in the question of whether there should or should not not be a recount. This at least is my understanding from FR posters. If that is accurate, Goldsmith would alter his order to close the case in federal court.


8 posted on 12/06/2016 7:29:07 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: EDINVA

You need to read the bold I highlighted in the post.


23 posted on 12/06/2016 7:34:05 PM PST by MarMema ("you can't make up...a constitutional right to a recount" Beloved Mi AG Bill Schuette)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson