Jill Stein, who got 1% nationally is either doing this as proxy for Clinton, else she is simply trying to cause trouble and undermine the country. What a waste of time and money. Especially as Clinton has already conceded the election. Does Stein think she will gain enough to beat Trump?!
I have to believe it is Clinton supporters who are donating to this cause, as a last ditch effort to change the results.
I have to believe it is Clinton supporters who are donating to this cause, as a last ditch effort to change the results.
There is no way a nobody like Jill Stein would get $7 million in donations (and in such a short time...and at a rate of $160,000 every 5 minutes,) without this being a part of Soros/Clinton plan to try and up-end the election Maybe this is why a nobody like Jill Stein ran, because this was going to be the game plan if the unthinkable happened and Donald Trump won. It’s time for the tar and feathers..
Remember, the Soros gang held a meeting after the election on post-election strategy. It is my gut feeling they came up with this - first, get some half-assed group to come out with semi-allegations about voting machine tampering without a scintilla of evidence. Second, get Stein to bring the initial recount request, even though she got all of 1 percent of the vote and won’t pick up any votes of consequence in a recount, so the fault for being a disruptive sore loser will not lie on Clinton. Then grab on to what, if any, additional votes she gets and then make all sorts of claims about hacking and votes not counted and somehow hope that they can get (or claim they should have gotten) an additional 22,000 votes in Wisconsin then take it to Michigan and Pennsylvania, with the support of their loud screamers in the streets and those threatening the lives of the individual Trump electors (truly disgusting that they have not denounced these bums). Where this strategy fails is as follows: first, those relatively few Wisconsin precincts that use voting machines are not centrally hooked up and do not use common software; they would have to be individually hacked which would be a monumentally complex job or the third district canvass (the second right after the election caught the 5000 vote Trump overcount) reveals additional overcounts, only none for Hillary. Second, Trump has an excellent legal team - his choice for White House counsel is an election lawyer who served as Chairman of the Federal Election Commission. Additionally, Reince Preibus, his new chief of staff and ex-RNC Chairthing, is from one of the best law firms in the State of Wisconsin - Michael, Best & Friedrich, which will provide an army of onsite lawyers with excellent knowledge of Wisconsin law, agencies and courts. Third, even if the Clintons could get past Wisconsin and Michigan, they have almost no chance to make up 70,000 votes to take the lead in Pennsylvania - in addition, recounting Pennsylvania opens up voting practices in Philadelphia which have historically been rife with vote adding and corruption (the Trump team should pound this). Thus, I would suspect that if Wisconsin looks like it will come up dry, the Clinton/Soros gang will abandon efforts in the other two states. One thing that I find surprising - Obama has not been supportive of her on the recount and also, he was apparently the one that pressured her to concede after zombie Podesta publicly appeared and seemed to say they would do nothing for the rest of Election Night. (Thank you, President Obama!) What this does indicate to me is that Hillary needs to be investigated after the inauguration for both the email scandal and the Foundation scandals; she and Soros have shown no patriotism or concern for this country in the slightest in taking this action and Trump needs not reciprocate with the slightest compassion by declining any further investigation of the Clinton/Soros gang’s dealings. Game on.