Posted on 11/25/2016 3:10:20 PM PST by fhayek
Yep.
The sick part of this is if she had not conceded, she would stand a chance of prevailing given the media driven firestorm.
The belief that the electors are going to perform anything other than a pro forma -- although legally necessary -- function is a lot of blather, again, intended to bring Trump's legitimacy into question.
Hillary is distressed because both of her money makers played out.
The first gave up its luster years ago, the back up with her stunning loss to Trump!
“Was that her 3am phone call?”
Yea, but she was drunk, just like Benghazi.
Gore conceded the election in 2000, then later un-conceded.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ah, you left out the rest of the story, here it is:
..........and then got his ass handed to him.
“He has already said he will be Carter on steroids.”
He’s really bent on taking that “Worst President Ever” title away from Jimmah for good!
My point stands, and your appeal to naked opinion hasn’t even answered, let alone refuted it.
FReind, I’m not contesting your point.
My only point was that Clinton’s “concession” meant nothing because the electoral college has yet to vote.
I thought you might be interested in the latest info on it. I believe it will have no impact.
And that's why Stein is filing for recount to "make sure our elections are honest." Yeah, right, Soros. You probably ran her for just this reason.
Well with Wisconsin going to a recount, we can take it out of the Trump collumn. MI and PA too if the recount....Democrats NEVER lose a recount. Im sure boxes of Democrat votes will turn up in a Milwaukee crack house.
While I would hope for that and think that is the best approach, somehow I know that Trump doesn't like the pesky mosquito.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.