Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy's New $4 Billion Stealth Warship Breaks Down (Again)
Zero Hedge ^ | 11/23/2016

Posted on 11/23/2016 10:52:43 AM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: SeekAndFind

No wonder. They’re floating it upside down!!!!

Smirk...


61 posted on 11/23/2016 1:27:58 PM PST by DoughtyOne (jcon40, "Are we be coming into the age of Sanity?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

As Josef Stalin said “QUANTITY HAS A QUALITY ALL IT’S OWN”.


62 posted on 11/23/2016 1:32:02 PM PST by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Hutchison Whampoa controlls the ports; Hutchison Whampoais owned by CK Hutchison Holdings Limited, a Chinese company tied to the PLA.


63 posted on 11/23/2016 1:49:01 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Of course it broke down....it’s full of Obama parts.


64 posted on 11/23/2016 2:06:29 PM PST by Gator113 (~DRAIN THE SWAMP~ ~ LOCK HER UP ~ ~DRAIN THE SWAMP~ ~DRAIN THE SWAMP~ ~DRAIN THE SWAMP~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Agreed!!!


65 posted on 11/23/2016 2:29:26 PM PST by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Theyou operate two ports but do not operate the canal as you said.

They do not operate the base the Z pulled.


66 posted on 11/23/2016 2:33:05 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: PIF

“It broke down in the Panama Canal run by the Chinese (an internet fact or just plain fact had you read the story) and is being repaired in”

Care to now acknowledge that you were incorrect on both of the above points?


67 posted on 11/23/2016 2:35:02 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Believe that Shermans were gasoline powered and German tanks were diesel powered which accounted for a difference in flammability when hit by an enemy’s shell.


68 posted on 11/23/2016 3:44:01 PM PST by Eleven Bravo 6 319thID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Eleven Bravo 6 319thID

German’Shepherd were gas fueled.


69 posted on 11/23/2016 3:57:15 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
And has how many guns? How many torpedo tubes?

2 x 30mm Bushmaster cannon, no torpedo tubes

(OK 2 x 155mm guns as well, which have no ammunition.)

America's enemies do tremble (with laughter)

70 posted on 11/23/2016 4:05:12 PM PST by Oztrich Boy ("Laws are for the guidance of wise men and the blind obedience of fools" Solon, Lawmaker of Athens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler; Rurudyne
Today's word is: "transformative"

IN Grandpappy's day if you had a good ship design, you would improve it by identifying the weakest system improve or replace it, thus staying a little ahead of The Threat. This worked between 95% (modifying existing) and 80% (new system) of the time. At worst you could go back to the old system (which the ship was originally designed for.)

But that only put you a little ahead. It's now 2016, and transformative: all new everything: hull design, machinery, radar, firecontol, weapons. Result, if it works, you've skipped a generation, and every nation stands in awe.

OK course, the chances of everything working right are <20%, and you've no backup systems.

71 posted on 11/23/2016 4:22:13 PM PST by Oztrich Boy ("Laws are for the guidance of wise men and the blind obedience of fools" Solon, Lawmaker of Athens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Eleven Bravo 6 319thID

German tanks were powered by gasoline engines. Only the Soviets medium and heavy tanks were diesel powered during WWII.


72 posted on 11/23/2016 5:06:37 PM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Pity we never got to see the attempt for transformative improvement on the war horse (that must have been a dismal failure) in the immediate back story of Monty Python and the Holy Grail.

Still, Camelot’s engineers managed to come up with something ... right?


73 posted on 11/23/2016 5:53:58 PM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

See http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/24652/Comparison-of-inexpensive-WWII-era-DDs#.WDZvmH2hNYM

kell553 wrote:IIRC a typical Sumner/Gearing DD was on the order of 8-10 million USD each while the various DEs built in WW2 were running 3.5-4 million each.

Hi,
This helps highlight one of the issues that has me a bit confused about this topic. In looking at “The Alternate Wars Archive” the hull and machinery contract costs for US Destroyers is listed ( http://www.alternatewars.com/Archives/Ships_Data_USN/Ships_Data.htm ) and in these tables it shows that ships like the USS Farragut (of the 8 ship Farragut class), launched in 1934 had a hull and machinery contract price of about $3,034,500 while USS Fletcher (of the 175 ship Fletcher class) had a hull and machinery costs of $6,330,000, USS Sumner (of the 58 ship Sumner class) $6,250,000, and USS Gearing (of the 98 ship Gearing class) $6,100,000.

As such, does the $6.1M + hull and machinery costs of the Fletcher, Sumner & Gearing classes represent the typical costs of a USN fleet destroyer and the $3.0M hull and machinery costs of the Farragut make them a low cost destroyer, or does the $3.0M cost of the Farragut represent the low end of the Fleet Destroyer costs for the USN, with low cost destroyers then assumed to be those costing $1.5M or less (for hull and machinery)?


74 posted on 11/23/2016 8:39:52 PM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

.
I suspect that we’ve already lost WW III.
.


75 posted on 11/23/2016 8:46:24 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

$50,000 (at least what it should cost).


76 posted on 11/23/2016 8:54:42 PM PST by Cvengr ( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound
You are overlooking two factors

1. Ship size: The Farraguts were 1400 ton ships, while the wartime destroyers were 2200-2600 tons.

2. It was wartime, building ships fast becomes more important than strict cost control. (On the other side of the pond, the late war C class cost almost twice the similarly sized late 30s Tribal class.)

77 posted on 11/23/2016 10:07:55 PM PST by Oztrich Boy ("Laws are for the guidance of wise men and the blind obedience of fools" Solon, Lawmaker of Athens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

I still think that the Zumwalt class looks like Disneyland submarines from the 1960s.


78 posted on 11/24/2016 10:07:25 PM PST by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Someone needs to borrow a few SUBSAFE seals from PEO SUBS.


79 posted on 11/24/2016 10:30:09 PM PST by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
And has how many guns? 2 × 155 mm Advanced Gun System
2 × 30 mm (1.2 in) Mk 46 Mod 2 Gun Weapon System

The lack of a proper CIWS is a major fault. We should have used someothing like the 35mm Millennium system

How many torpedo tubes?
None. But it has 80 cells which can hold the RUM-139 VL-ASROC.

80 posted on 11/25/2016 4:10:57 PM PST by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson